Based on what fact based, reasoned analysis?
In 2008, the Democrats passed her over for a little known Senator who was still wet behind the ears, after she'd been angling for the job for almost a decade.
Despite overwhelming name recognition and fame, she was edged out by a two bit nobody from Chicago.
And you're still convinced she's invincible? Take a good look at her sometime. She looks twenty years older than her true age, and really sick. She's worn out, friend. She's probably not even healthy enough to withstand the rigors of a national presidential campaign. She certainly won't be in another three years.
I don’t think she is invincible. I work with a couple of Dems that wanted to vote for her but were blocked in 2008. I’m sure this happened all over the country. Obama was the candidate of choice. Seems that they may be more overtly aggressive in getting their desired candidate nominated.
The Pubs are more subtle and don’t use bully tactics. Well...unless the overt demolition of Newt.
If the Dems decide it is her turn..it will be. And the MSM will pile on.