The way it’s done these days, painless injection of anesthetic and a heart stooping chemical 10 to 20 years after conviction, is far from what’s just. And especially in a case such as this. Cruel should be the usual punishment for this kind of monster disguising himself as a human.
“The way it’s done these days, painless injection of anesthetic and a heart stooping chemical 10 to 20 years after conviction, is far from what’s just.”
I agree, and we can thank the left (again) for screwing things up. They always appear far, far more concerned about the murderers than the people they murder. The victims don’t get to tell us how they feel.
I don’t think the state should attempt to torture murderers, but killing a murderer is probably always cruel to that person. Getting strung up, I’m sure, is not a pleasant experience. Nevertheless, killing a murderer is not an unusual punishment. It’s totally justified and the ONLY punishment that makes sense for certain heinous crimes.
I also think criminals should be given reasonable time, like one year, to explore the appeal process, but this 10, 20 or 30 years on death row stuff? That’s totally unjust!
In regards to death by injection, I don’t know what the big deal is. I’ve had pets put down by vets. It’s a quick and apparently painless experience. Let me guess? We can’t use drugs that aren’t FDA approved for human use to execute someone. If it’s humane enough for animals, it’s humane enough for a child-murdering nut job.