” Congress lacks the so-called “legal standing” to present the case and they would have a “tough time” finding somebody hurt enough by the delays to be a good plaintiff.”
Standing! Why doesn’t Congress itself have “legal standing” if the separation of powers is being violated?
It’s called ‘no cahonies’.
... and it's a law passed by Congress that is being illegally changed!!
This has nothing -- absolutely nothing -- to do with "standing". It's that no one in a position of authority -- no judge and certainly no politician -- wants to go down in history as the one responsible for impeaching or removing the first "black" president (even though, of course, the petty tyrant is only fractionally "black" and, more importantly, what is being attacked here by the petty tyrant is the U.S. Constitution itself!)
Trey Gowdy explains the “standing” issue - no guarantee on how courts would “rule”. Mike Kelly on the Kelly file said there needs to be a public outrage.
Video from 2.15.14
2:10 Minutes [Too short – cuts off]
Fox News Is Obama overstepping his boundaries
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTwjzDi_d4k
3 things we can do:
– 3 clowns up for ambassadorships in the senate –advice and consent clause
– House is appropriations – cut the money
– Pursue standing law where we have institutional standing based on vote nullification
– November - citizens will vote accordingly
The following video and article are from December 2013 in which Gowdy explains that Congress is pursuing a law for institutional standing based on vote nullification.
4:54 Minutes
Congressman: Obama’s Disregard Of Law ‘Has Reached An Unprecedented Level’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOFmkakFhWg
Rep. Trey Gowdy: Obama’s disregard of law ‘has reached an unprecedented level’
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/15/congressman-trey-gowdy-obamas-disregard-of-law-has-reached-an-unprecedented-level-video/