It’s only a “legal error” when the ruling goes against the commie and Nazi piggies.
Sarah is feeling kinda miniscule in the shadow of Opportunist Mark and his debilitated wife, showcase, puppet, anti-gun Icon, Gabby..
Frankly, Sarah is feeling oh so decades ago and needs to establish some relevancy here. In the wake of Gabby and Mark, they’ve seen some rather deep cuts in their funding profile.
Appalling that the Brady’s WERE Republicans.
To demonstrate the "dangerous" aspect of the Ninth Circuit's decision, the Brady Campaign cited the death of Trayvon Martin. They did not mention, however, that George Zimmerman--the man who shot Martin--was acquitted of any wrongdoing on grounds of self-defense. (My emphasis.)
By citing the legitimate and legal extermination of a wannabe murderer and piece of subhuman vermin and calling themselves a "Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence" they've given themselves away as a campaign to promote and facilitate violent crime. "Gun Violence," after all, includes both legitimate and legal killings, like that of St. Trayvon of the Skittles (SBUH) and the most horrific of crimes, like Nidal Hassan's atrocity at Ft. Hood.
No mistake, however the above article is mistaken in that the ruling was not against California but against San Diego County. The ruling could have future implications for California and areas under the 9th Circuit.