Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The $2.2 Billion Bird-Scorching Solar Project
Wall St. Journal ^ | February 12, 2014 | Cassandra Sweet

Posted on 02/13/2014 10:48:49 PM PST by grundle

At California's Ivanpah Plant, Mirrors Produce Heat and Electricity—And Kill Wildlife

A giant solar-power project officially opening this week in the California desert is the first of its kind, and may be among the last, in part because of growing evidence that the technology it uses is killing birds.

U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz is scheduled to speak Thursday at an opening ceremony for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating Station, which received a $1.6 billion federal loan guarantee.

The $2.2 billion solar farm, which spans over five square miles of federal land southwest of Las Vegas, includes three towers as tall as 40-story buildings. Nearly 350,000 mirrors, each the size of a garage door, reflect sunlight onto boilers atop the towers, creating steam that drives power generators.

The owners of the project— NRG Energy Inc., Google Inc. and BrightSource Energy Inc., the company that developed the "tower power" solar technology—call the plant a major feat of engineering that can light up about 140,000 homes a year.

the BrightSource system appears to be scorching birds that fly through the intense heat surrounding the towers, which can reach 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

The company, which is based in Oakland, Calif., reported finding dozens of dead birds at the Ivanpah plant over the past several months

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: brightsource; energy; ivanpah; solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Of course this isn’t a problem for the spotted owl...


21 posted on 02/14/2014 12:41:52 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Wait until the next hail storm.


22 posted on 02/14/2014 12:52:10 AM PST by chemicalman (The more support I see,the harder I want to work,and the more determined I am not to let folks down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

In 1949 a solar furnace for melting steel was built in France.


23 posted on 02/14/2014 1:10:44 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: monocle

We should add...this French furnace in 1949...handled 50kW of power. It was a state-funded university project. You would have thought that he’d have won the Nobel Prize for stuff like this....but apparently didn’t get much publicity out of the episode. There’s also some suggestion that he really stepped on various toes of the French and European science community by building this and proving several industrial uses. Even the Wiki guys barely give him eight lines of text. He was probably sixty years ahead of his time.


24 posted on 02/14/2014 1:28:53 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

and at a cost of ONLY $16,000 per house!


25 posted on 02/14/2014 1:40:06 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

$11,111 per home?

If this puppy can keep this up for enough years, it could break even.


26 posted on 02/14/2014 2:24:55 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar for you if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

If Darwin is correct, no changes will have to be made to the solar thermal generators, the birds will adapt and develop skins and feathers which are impervious to high temperatures.

Phoenix?


27 posted on 02/14/2014 2:34:06 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: urbanpovertylawcenter

Phoenixes? Phoenices?


28 posted on 02/14/2014 2:35:39 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar for you if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I>And actually this doesn’t look like all that bad an idea for a solar project.

$2.2 BILLION to produce a PEAK output of 377 MW, but with only a 29% capacity factor - which translates into 110 MW (avg) power plant. That is a cost of over $20/W! Conventional power plants cost $1-2/W.

Another payoff from Obama to Google.

29 posted on 02/14/2014 2:43:15 AM PST by raybbr (I weep over my sons' future in this Godforsaken country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

The initial capitalization of the plant isn’t the only cost there, though.

There’s also the fuel, which for this sun plant is zero.

It might or might not add up to a stunning bargain, but to dismiss it based on a one dimensional analysis is not thinking.


30 posted on 02/14/2014 2:47:22 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar for you if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Idiots!.....The birds are drinking the windex and choking on paper towels.


31 posted on 02/14/2014 3:04:55 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
If this puppy can keep this up for enough years, it could break even.

The problem is that it can't power any homes at night, so it is mostly useful for 1/2 the year (at most) that A/C needs coincide with power generation. The rest of the time the power is not created at peak time (evening) therefore it is simply not needed since a conventional boiler can't be turned off every day and turned back on at night.

32 posted on 02/14/2014 3:20:22 AM PST by palmer (don't feed the bears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
There’s also the fuel, which for this sun plant is zero.

Nope. There's O&M which for this plant is huge. Fuel for conventional plants costs money, but other O&M costs are much lower.

33 posted on 02/14/2014 3:21:59 AM PST by palmer (don't feed the bears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Bookmark.


34 posted on 02/14/2014 4:01:45 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The problem is you also need the water and lots of it.


35 posted on 02/14/2014 4:07:10 AM PST by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: palmer

When solar panels collect dust and grime, they lose much of their effectiveness, so they must be cleaned frequently. Where, exactly, are we going to get the water needed for cleaning in the middle of the desert? And who’s going to be out there wiping down 500,000 acres of panels?

Furthermore, the more distant a source of electricity is from where it’s used, the more of it you lose during transmission, as much as 50% over 115 miles.


36 posted on 02/14/2014 4:09:45 AM PST by Recon Dad (Force Recon Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Birds. If the wind generators don’t get them, the solar array will.


37 posted on 02/14/2014 4:11:52 AM PST by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
It is a $1.6 billion loan guarantee to light up 144,000 homes. If it succeeds, the loan will be repaid and the guarantee cancelled. Anybody out there that can calculate the cost benefit analysis on this?

The cost is to the lowly taxpayer. The benefit is to the Regime's politically connected friends.

38 posted on 02/14/2014 4:16:21 AM PST by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Yesterday’s thread on the topic (different news source, not duplicate)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3122668/posts

Includes some more pictures


39 posted on 02/14/2014 5:11:50 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
does it produce power at night?

No, but electrical power usage goes down at night. Solar in this area (Vegas) produces the most power when the AC load is the highest.

The government subsidies are the real problem, not the technology.

40 posted on 02/14/2014 5:14:03 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson