Posted on 02/13/2014 5:53:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Valentine’s Day in the 21st century means fewer heart-shaped candy boxes for college women than they would have received in the 20th century. Some women with steady, longstanding boyfriends may get a treat, but casual sex — the hook-up — has made dating much less common.
Under the hook-up regime, women who want a man’s attention are expected to dress provocatively and show up at a fraternity house or bar. After drinking too much, some guy will suggest they go somewhere and hook up, which can consist of anything from deep kissing to intercourse. The men are not attentive during or after the one-night stand. Less than half the women have orgasms, and the men frequently ignore the hook-up partner entirely if they should meet again on campus.
Most college women are not happy about this state of affairs. This would be clear to any observer who could sit in on my sex-differences seminar during the week when we discuss contemporary courtship or its absence. This past fall, I asked 16 female seminar participants if they personally knew — not knew of, but knew — a woman who they thought had been very seriously harmed emotionally because of hook-ups. Every hand went up.
The men, typically, have no problems with hook-ups, and many vigorously pursue them. In class they tend to be quiet on the subject, but this year one tall, handsome fellow was willing to engage. He seemed to be speaking for all men he knew when he said “hook-ups aren’t going away.” But he was genuinely surprised and concerned that so many women were angry about them.
The literature on hook-ups shows that what I have observed at the University of Virginia is typical. In the book Premarital Sex in America, Mark Regnerus and Jeremy Uecker report that having more sexual partners is associated with “poorer emotional states in women, but not in men.” The more sexual partners a woman has in her lifetime, the more likely she is to be depressed, to cry almost every day, and to report relatively low satisfaction with her life as a whole. Elsewhere I have surveyed the evolutionary and hormonal factors that lead men and women to react so differently to casual sex.
But why do women have casual sex if they don’t want to? First, in their experimental phase, they don’t know that they won’t like it. Men and women in my upper-division classes agree that first-year women participate in hook-ups much more than fourth-years do. Some of the frat boys show up at freshman orientation events to get a head start on their seductions. A few even have a cute name for their prey: “fresh meat.”
Second, sex ratios matter. Now that women outnumber men on college campuses, they must compete with each other to give men more of what they want if they expect to find male companionship. Where there are more men than women on a campus, on the other hand, it’s men who have to compete, so women can successfully make things move more slowly physically. With sex ratios in college consistently lopsided over the past decade — women earn 57 percent of bachelor’s degrees — men set the mating tone on most campuses.
But young men haven’t always acted this way. In the middle of the last century, being a leader of a group of young men led to “comfortable dating, or perhaps early marriage,” Eleanor Maccoby writes, whereas the same social position today leads to “a greater readiness to exploit sexual opportunities and display sexual prowess.” By the time they reached their twenties, men used to settle down with one woman and raise a family. They used to be willing to answer to a wife and a boss for 40 to 50 hours a week for 40 to 50 years. But men famously hate to be told what to do. Why, then, did they so frequently become reliable partners?
They did it in midcentury because it was clearer what a man’s responsibilities were, and it was important work. Men were the providers and protectors and heads of the family; now they’re told they’re half the provider, sometimes less, and half the nurturer of the children — which they recognize as a cruel joke the moment they learn that, when they comfort her, the infant doesn’t stop crying as she does for her breast feeding mother. Working women have achieved important gains from these changes in behavior and expectations, but for men, going from head of the family to maybe half the provider and less than half with children doesn’t sound like a promotion. They may be slower to get with the program.
But, just as important, men settled down earlier in the past because they could not get good-looking and intelligent women to pay attention to them unless they had “prospects.” Men had to be marriageable and ready to commit to a relationship or most women would not have sex with them. Most men in their twenties still want marriage in the distant future, but they see no reason not to partake of the bodily charms of many attractive, intelligent women in the meantime. To bed women in our age, men find that good pectoral muscles (thus time in the gym) can be as useful as good career prospects (time in the library) — though with the shortage of men on college campuses, they may not need either.
The contemporary mating culture helps explain why men these days take so long to grow up. Sexual mores matter. Today’s lead to remarkably crude men, but also, and perhaps more significantly, remarkably juvenile ones.
The real tragedy is the effect that hook-ups have on the emotional well-being of so many women. Simon Baron Cohen’s The Essential Difference shows that, more than males, females crave connection to other humans from the first months of life, expressing instincts that are essential to happy families and supportive communities.
— Steven E. Rhoads is a professor of politics at the University of Virginia and the author of Taking Sex Differences Seriously.
But I thought more women were going to college these days and that men were falling behind according many articles I’ve read that were distributed by the MSM. This article isn’t matching up with what they said earlier do someone is lying...: )
When my son was being recruited by the Univ of San Diego for football, on the campus visit, one of the selling points was there were four women to every guy on campus.
An interesting article.
BTW - the term “meat” when applied to women is not new.
In the 1970’s I was a young AF Lt. going through a 9-month school in California. Every Thursday night the Officer’s Club was “invaded” by young, good looking women in search of weekend dates with us. Talk about a man’s fantasy world. Everyone knew what the rules were; there was no need to spend days trying to get a date; and it was totally acceptable to ignore each other the following weekend. Fun but very very empty.
Sound familiar?
This is pretty much drivel on the same order of the old Gloria Steinem crap.
Ugh. Only a fool would marry such women.
that pretty much sums up what the article says... fewer men on college campuses... so they set the "dating" tone...
Ah. Memories of the Nellis Debs at Nellis AFB in LV in the 80s.
They even had a book with bios and name tags. All you needed was
A flight suit....
Grow up?
I think the writer needs to grow up.
Young men behave the way they do as a logical response to women's liberation.
I'd rather loaf and enjoy life playing video games than get married to a modern slut harpy and in a society that will always take her side over mine in the inevitable divorce.
Hell with that. Stay single guys and always use a condom so when she "accidentally" forgets to take her pills, she won't get pregnant and make the government force you to support the kid she told you she didn't plan on having.
Sounds like the plot-line from "An Officer and a Gentleman".
My tear ducts are dry as a bone.
The marxist ideal, being put into practice on colleges.
The current culture defines male "maturity" as "behaving as women want men to behave", while ignoring the set of incentives and disincentives which men currently operate under.
For most of history, marriage was how a man got a steady sexual partner, who would provide him with a home and children, in exchange for support and protection. Men found it an acceptable deal.
For decades, marriage has become less and less attractive to men, especially men-with-options. Marriage is an opportunity to attach yourself to a woman who is likely to wind up ruining you financially in divorce, take away your kids, and spend her life alienating them from you.
Marriage also tended to ensure that the average man got a woman of his own. In the current "hook up" culture, you have lots of women chasing after the most desirable men. This results in the "alpha" males getting lots of sex, and the "beta" males being ignored. The alpha male has no incentive to commit, because his current woman is very replaceable.
The beta male gets little opportunity to commit, because the women are chasing the alphas -- at least until they hit their 30's and start whining about the lack of "good men willing to commit", when the alphas they were chasing lose interest and go after younger women.
Maybe there’s more men working to put their wives and girlfriends through college. My son is doing that for his wife...: )
Boo freakin' hoo. You can thank Hillary Clinton, Gloria Steinem, and NOW for your current state of affairs. Men have become marginalized over the past 40 years.
These women can't handle the truth, i.e. you can't have it all.
The girls in AOAG were trying to marry their way out of poverty by becoming officers’ wives.
Remember the guy who washed out? His `girlfriend’ dumped him as no longer a prospect, and he hanged himself.
So.. today’s college girls are still going for that coveted Mrs degree? Not bloody likely, mate. The Devil’s Dictionary defines `husband’ as, “one who, having dined, is charged with the care of the plate.”
And it prolly isn’t even HIS spawn.
Do you read roosh?
I’m glad I went to college when women were chaste....
And upon occasion, caught.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.