Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I'm Getting Sick of Defending Obamacare
National Journal ^ | Feb 11, 2014 | Ron Fournier

Posted on 02/11/2014 7:23:09 AM PST by upchuck

It's getting difficult and slinking toward impossible to defend the Affordable Care Act. The latest blow to Democratic candidates, liberal activists, and naïve columnists like me came Monday from the White House, which announced yet another delay in the Obamacare implementation.

For the second time in a year, certain businesses were given more time before being forced to offer health insurance to most of their full-time workers. Employers with 50 to 99 workers were given until 2016 to comply, two years longer than required by law. During a yearlong grace period, larger companies will be required to insure fewer employees than spelled out in the law.

Not coincidentally, the delays punt implementation beyond congressional elections in November, which raises the first problem with defending Obamacare: The White House has politicized its signature policy.

The win-at-all-cost mentality helped create a culture in which a partisan-line vote was deemed sufficient for passing transcendent legislation. It spurred advisers to develop a dishonest talking point—"If you like your health plan, you'll be able to keep your health plan." And political expediency led Obama to repeat the line, over and over and over again, when he knew, or should have known, it was false.

Defending the ACA became painfully harder when online insurance markets were launched from a multibillion-dollar website that didn't work, when autopsies on the administration's actions revealed an epidemic of incompetence that began in the Oval Office and ended with no accountability.

Then officials started fudging numbers and massaging facts to promote implementation, nothing illegal or even extraordinary for this era of spin. But they did more damage to the credibility of ACA advocates.

Finally, there are the ACA rule changes—27 major adjustments, according to Fox News, without congressional approval. J. Mark Iwry, deputy assistant Treasury secretary for health policy, said the administration has broad "authority to grant transition relief" under a section of the Internal Revenue Code that directs the Treasury secretary to "prescribe all needful rules and regulations for the enforcement" of tax obligations, according to The New York Times.

Yes, Obamacare is a tax.

Advocates for a strong executive branch, including me, have given the White House a pass on its rule-making authority, because implementing such a complicated law requires flexibility. But the law may be getting stretched to the point of breaking. Think of the ACA as a game of Jenga: Adjust one piece and the rest are affected; adjust too many and it falls.

If not illegal, the changes are fueling suspicion among Obama-loathing conservatives, and confusion among the rest of us. Even the law's most fervent supporters are frustrated.

Ron Pollack, executive director of the consumer lobby Families USA and an ally of the White House, told The Washington Post he was "very surprised" by the latest delays. For workers at large companies that don't provide coverage, he said, "It's very unfortunate … that they don't have a guarantee it will be extended to them for quite some time."

Put me in the frustrated category. I want the ACA to work because I want health insurance provided to the millions without it, for both the moral and economic benefits. I want the ACA to work because, as Charles Lane wrote for The Washington Post, the link between work and insurance needs to be broken. I want the ACA to work because the GOP has not offered a serious alternative that can pass Congress.

Unfortunately, the president and his team are making their good intentions almost indefensible.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 113th; 2012electionbias; abortion; aca; deathpanels; demagogicparty; democrats; excuses; failure; fournier; goodintentions; howtostealanelection; huac; huaca; husseins; intentions; lapdogmedia; memebuilding; miserablefailure; obamacare; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; pravdamedia; ronfournier; unaffordablecareact; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: upchuck
Put me in the frustrated category. I want the ACA to work because I want health insurance provided to the millions without it...

Looks like Ron still wants to believe in Santa Claus after all. In fact, the principal beneficiaries of 0bamacare are the well-funded bureaucracy it creates. It's of the government, by the government, and for the government. Pills For The Poor was always a scam and it simply hasn't happened yet, and if it ever does it will be an afterthought.

In point of fact, Ron is discovering that his ability to feel good is costing the rest of us a great deal of money and a great deal of political freedom. He's still for it, though, so long as it continues to make him feel nobler than the people he's defrauding.

21 posted on 02/11/2014 8:12:39 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Work = money = stuff I wanna buy.


22 posted on 02/11/2014 8:16:32 AM PST by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I want health insurance provided to the millions without it, for both the moral and economic benefits. <<

...and I want Unicorns to poop skittles.....and what moral and economic benefits?????????????

23 posted on 02/11/2014 8:19:08 AM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I want health insurance provided to the millions without it, for both the moral and economic benefits.

Mr. Fournier, there is nothing moral about taking people's money at gunpoint because you "want health insurance provided to the millions." No matter how "charitable" you may think you are with other people's money, your real purpose is self-aggrandizement. Worse, there is no constitutional power for your Federal agents to do your paid hit for you. It is therefore taking money at gunpoint illegally. It is theft.

So much for "moral benefits."

24 posted on 02/11/2014 8:22:40 AM PST by Carry_Okie (0-Care IS Medicaid; they'll pull a sheet over your head and take everything you own to pay for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I want the ACA to work because the GOP has not offered a serious alternative that can pass Congress.

Notice Fournie did not say the GOP has "...not offered a serious alternative that can work..."

25 posted on 02/11/2014 8:24:39 AM PST by Prov1322 (Enjoy my wife's incredible artwork at www.watercolorARTwork.com! (This space no longer for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prov1322

Yeah, what a DB. The guy decries the “win at all costs” mentality that led to Obamacare, then criticizes the GOP for not being able to effectively overcome/fight it.


26 posted on 02/11/2014 8:35:28 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

You forget that the cost of medical care is very tightly linked with what the government will pay for a particular procedure, not supply and demand or market forces.


27 posted on 02/11/2014 8:39:10 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
...I want the ACA to work because I want health insurance provided to the millions without it...

Idiot. This 2010 turd started with 30 million and ends with 30 million "uninsured".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/07/obamacare-leaves-millions-uninsured-heres-who-they-are/

28 posted on 02/11/2014 9:04:21 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Ron you are a blithering idiot from the land of unicorns.


29 posted on 02/11/2014 9:14:19 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Well of course....ever since government got involved....that was my point. I’m old enough to remember when there was no government in healthcare...and doctors made house calls....and we were lower middle class...


30 posted on 02/11/2014 9:48:35 AM PST by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Who is this guy’s doctor, anyway? What if doctors said to these people who have ruined medicine for all of us—get lost!! Hit the road, M’sieu Fournier!


31 posted on 02/11/2014 10:05:01 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The win-at-all-cost mentality helped create a culture in which a partisan-line vote was deemed sufficient for passing transcendent legislation

He says this disparagingly as though the heavy handed tactic is something to be looked down on yet Fournier still backed ACA.

These people make NO sense.

32 posted on 02/11/2014 10:19:21 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
If it were not for work provided insurance, most people would not be able to afford health insurance.

If a tax credit is provided instead, millions can shop for their own insurance and prices will come way down.

Employer provided insurance is keeping prices sky high.

33 posted on 02/11/2014 10:21:26 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prov1322

I zeroed in in that too. It seens to me a de facto admission that the GOP has offered serious proposals.


34 posted on 02/11/2014 11:46:54 AM PST by pluvmantelo (The thing of it is, we must live with the living- Michel de Montaigne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: upchuck
I want the ACA to work because the GOP has not offered a serious alternative that can pass Congress.

Hey, Obamacare proved that with a slim majority and a lot of bribery, anything can pass Congress--no matter what.

37 posted on 02/11/2014 4:13:15 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The link between work and insurance needs to be broken.

The collusion between the DNC and MSM on daily talking points needs to be broken.

38 posted on 02/11/2014 4:28:13 PM PST by a fool in paradise ("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
sick??? i hope you get so sick that you start puking up sh!t from past lifetimes...
39 posted on 02/11/2014 4:32:28 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
"I want the ACA to work because the GOP has not offered a serious alternative that can pass Congress."

What a disingenuous bastard! Blame Harry Reid and the Democrats' Borg-minded intransigence, not Republicans for that!

HF

40 posted on 02/11/2014 4:37:39 PM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson