Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

The system is supposed to be based on reasonable doubt. The fact that there was reasonable doubt, regardless of what their criminals were or whether they had a lower level of participation in the crime, is supposed to set them free.


65 posted on 02/09/2014 1:35:53 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30
How can there be "reasonable doubt" in a case where one of the perpetrators confessed to the crime? LOL.

By your standards, no jury would ever be able to convict anyone of a crime unless they witnessed the crime themselves.

67 posted on 02/09/2014 1:39:24 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson