Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lockbox
Something to keep in mind here is that water consumption by humans is dwarfed by most agricultural and industrial uses. This is why one of my guiding principles of human settlement, land development and civil engineering is that water resources should be used as a rigid determinant of where many land uses should be permitted. If an area doesn't provide enough rainfall to support more than X people, Y head of cattle, or Z acres of orange groves, then it probably isn't a good idea to plan and design around values that exceed X, Y and Z in this case.

There's always room to use conservation, creativity and technology to push the limits on X, Y and Z -- but I would much rather see these as interim measures or stop-gap measures for unusual conditions.

18 posted on 02/08/2014 9:04:29 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Do you mean to say that you advocate central planning, Leviathan, Utopia?


22 posted on 02/08/2014 9:34:31 AM PST by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson