Well, first I note that this is not a response to my comments regarding an Article V convention concerns. Second, I have stated several times above that I am not arguing against such a convention just uging caution and making sure that is our only alternative at this point in time. I also said it may very well be our only alternative. I'm just going to immediately knee jerk, jump on board based on the naive wack job ravings I've heard so far on this thread who's only real defense of the idea seems to be that they heard the favorite talk radio host suggest the plan.
So you think The Federalist #39, 43, 85 which each deal in part with amending the constitution through the state amendment process were written by naïve wack jobs?