[Cringing Negativism Network]

I agree.

At the same time, George P stay way way away from amnesty.

There is a good way to deal with hispanics, but not by giving away everything.

I do agree we need to watch the level of discourse.

That said, I like him so far.

[Paine in the Neck]

You’re not getting the Bush-speak. “Opposing amnesty for illegals” = “ignorant statements about Hispanics”. That’s what W meant, that’s what Jeb means and that’s what Geo. P. means.

[SoConPubbie]

I do agree we need to watch the level of discourse.

And what does that mean?

You'll notice that George P. didn't give any examples or clearly define what he meant, he just threw an open-ended statement out there with no clarification whatsoever.

So what do you mean by that statement of yours?

How does FreeRepublic need to "watch the level of discourse"?

[okie01]

At the same time, George P stay way way away from amnesty.

Which he will -- IF he respects the views of LEGAL Hispanics. I've seen two polls of legal Hispanics that show them disposed against amnesty by a 2-to-1 margin (roughly 60-32).

And why not? They are American citizens first -- by virtue of being American for generations or investing the effort and expense of jumping thru all the legal immigration hoops. They don't want their citizenship cheapened any more than we Anglos do.

I do agree we need to watch the level of discourse.

However, what is ethnically objectionable about “Abortion Barbie with Hispanic Sen. Leticia Van de Putte as her running mate"?

I fail to understand the problem with this posting.

Leticia Van de Putte is Hispanic, is she not?