Posted on 02/06/2014 11:50:21 PM PST by Olog-hai
Allah has promised Israel to the Jews—so says Sheikh Ahmad Adwan, a Muslim scholar living in Jordan, who declared on his Facebook page recently that “Palestine” doesn’t exist.
Blogger Elder of Ziyon translated Arab news sources that this Saturday reported on Adwan’s statements, in which he quotes the Koran saying Allah assigned Israel to the Jews until the Day of Judgment (Sura 5 Verse 21), and that Jews are the inheritors of Israel (Sura 26 Verse 59). …
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
There are two Koran’s. One was written by Mohammed in Mecca, which is the peaceful version. The second was written by Mohammed in Medina and is political or a harsher version towards Kafirs,(unbelievers) and abrogates or invalidates contradictory verses in the Meccan version.
So, though it may be true that Mohammed recognized the right of Jews to occupy Israel as decreed by God, he abrogates, or invalidates this verse in the Meccan version.
Most if not all Muslims prescribe to the Meccan version. So, there is no contradiction in the two versions.
On further study of “Abrogation in the Koran” by Rev. Anwaral Haqq, June 2006, http://www.muhammadanism.org/Quran/abrogation_koran.pdf, neither of these verses are listed as being abrogated. If so, Israel has been granted to the Jews by God.
Don’t think Muslims will go along with Haqq’s study though.
And where in Jordan did he formerly live?
I’ve heard this once before, a couple of years ago. A Muslim scholar said that the Koran specifically states that Allah gave Israel to the Jews. But this Jordanian guy, he’s not long for this world.
there is a major Muslim cleric who lives in Italy who has said the same thing, backed by parts of the Koran - G-d gave the land to Israel for the people we now know as Jews
as a political matter
from 1948 through another 20 add years, the PLO and groups they allied with were not demanding a “Palestinian state” for “Palestinians”; they made no such claims; they more honestly then than now admitted that their political agenda was rhe destruction of Israel and kicking the Jews out
the switch to the “Palestinian state” approach came as their larger agenda, a “pan-Arab” and “pan-Muslim” approach, seeking a pan-national Arab-Muslim state from Egypt to Iraq lost all its state-sponsors (It was short lived in a makeshift political union of Egyt and Sryia), and Nasser in Egypt and Arafat were no longer best buds
a new cause had to be named - “the Palestinian state”
the political class in “Palestine” likes to claim that the Jews that are in Israel were never part of that land; and as they do they pretend everyone is suppose to ignore that like many of the Jewish settlers from the late 1800s on, many of the Arab settlers are from the same era and are no more “native” than “the Jews”, with many of their grand parents and great grand parents immigrating from Arabia, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and elsewhere - but apparently just being Arab or Muslim makes them more “native” than the Jewish settlers, no matter where from or when their family actually 1st settled in the area
am I talking about most of the Arabs there? no, but it is in reference to a very good many
the racist “apartied” charge is really the pot calling the kettle black
the constitution, make up and governance of Israel makes it a “racially”, ethnically and religiously a diverse and tolerant society, with even an Arab Israeli jurist sitting on the Israeli supreme court
the goal at the base of the PLO and all “palestian” movements IS for an Arab, Muslim exclusionist society and if their core dream could be met it would be without a Jew in sight
yet Israel is the one called “racist”
Did you see this?
Thanks, comes as no surprise, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.