Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Soucheray: So why don't the anti-smoking zealots care about marijuana?
St. Paul Pioneer Press ^ | 2/4/14 | Joe Soucheray

Posted on 02/05/2014 8:12:20 AM PST by rhema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2014 8:12:20 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema

Because Pot turns people into liberals and useful idiots. That’s why.


2 posted on 02/05/2014 8:14:30 AM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred

Cause they can’t tax smokes anyone since so few are smoking, going after left people smoke pot, tax it, them demonize it later.


3 posted on 02/05/2014 8:15:23 AM PST by edcoil ( "All men's miseries derive from not being able to sit in a quiet room alone." - Blaise Pascal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Just wait until Big Tobacco becomes Big Marijuana, then there will be someone with Big Pockets to sue.
There's no profit in suing anyone for secondary pot smoke just yet.

4 posted on 02/05/2014 8:17:25 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

If it wasn’t so pitiful it would be hilarious to watch the Tobacco Police twist themselves into pretzels trying to justify their support of dope smoking while opposing tobacco smoking.


5 posted on 02/05/2014 8:23:18 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime." - Lavrentiy Beria (& Eric Holder))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Cultural reasons. Cigarettes are associated with the older, more conservative, pre-hippie generations... farmers, ranchers, housewives, blue-color workers. Marijuana is associated with hippie libs, the righteous self-absorbed “me” generations... and everything ‘they’ do is automatically a virtuous pursuit of enlightenment and freedom. The latter now control the culture, and their nasty vices require constant confirmation and celebration.


6 posted on 02/05/2014 8:25:01 AM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

It’s their hatred of corporations.

Notice they are for De-criminalization of pot, not legalization

There is a significant difference.

De-criminalization, things a like now except nobody get arrested

Legalization, big corporations start selling their own mass produced brands


7 posted on 02/05/2014 8:25:03 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Because “Big Tobacco” were once HUGE Republican donors.

If they were huge Democrap donors we would all be hearing about the healthful benefits of “bathing your lungs in cleansing smoke”

8 posted on 02/05/2014 8:25:58 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Second hand smoke from a doobie is intoxicating! Unlike liquor, the person next to you doesn’t get drunk on what you drink!


9 posted on 02/05/2014 8:31:37 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greene66
and their nasty vices require constant confirmation and celebration.

....including fudge-packing, infanticide, and carpet licking.

10 posted on 02/05/2014 8:35:01 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Potheads are not fully mentally aware. That makes them excellent democrat voters.


11 posted on 02/05/2014 8:39:49 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Does Joe still think the Tea Party is a pack of rabbis dogs?


12 posted on 02/05/2014 8:41:23 AM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat2

Did someone say carpet licking?


13 posted on 02/05/2014 8:42:21 AM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: greene66
There is something of reverse class warfare in the dope vs. tobacco argument. Cigarette smoking has moved down the socioeconomic ladder since the 1960s. Blacks, Hispanics, and blue collar and rural whites are more likely to smoke than the financially better off and more formally educated. Therefore, tobacco use is subject to social stigmatization, high taxes, and constant nagging from the government and "public service" advertisements. Marijuana users are generally not high achievers, but tend to be family members of high achievers. Certainly marijuana use occurs among poor people as well, but if it were confined to them, this drug would be as socially marginal as crack or meth.

Prohibition of marijuana and other illegal drugs has been an abject failure if the goal was to end its availability in the underground market. Alcohol prohibition was a failure as well. However, the end of alcohol prohibition and the subsequent availability in the open market led to more drinking. Similar results will occur with marijuana.

14 posted on 02/05/2014 8:49:41 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Probably something to do with public smoking of marijuana not being legal.


15 posted on 02/05/2014 8:53:24 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Up until 1967, when the “Solid South” began to turn from democrat to republican, democrats had no problem with tobacco and oil. As soon as those industries began to give their sizable corporate campaign contributions to republicans, all of a sudden, cigarettes and gasoline became poisonous symbols of American industrial greed and the subject of intense government-financed scientific scrutiny. Always follow the money!


16 posted on 02/05/2014 8:59:26 AM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

We have a stoner president and we know how that worked out another reason to keep it illegal.


17 posted on 02/05/2014 9:01:44 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Doesn’t it set off the smoke alarms in trendy apartments?


18 posted on 02/05/2014 9:05:47 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I’ve been asking this question for a long time. I used to volunteer usher at a music venue, and we had to direct tobacco smokers to their designated corner, but pot smokers could enjoy the music while toking. When I asked why, I was told pot smells better and is socially acceptable. (this was CA)


19 posted on 02/05/2014 9:08:40 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

pot does not smell better

Some of it literally smells like skunk and some like poop.

I think people have to be stupid to smoke anything, especially if it smells like crap, literally


20 posted on 02/05/2014 9:11:41 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson