Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA
 photo 2A27BD11-1091-4A1D-8910-A27FEFEBA902_zps904ankpq.jpg
54 posted on 02/04/2014 8:53:20 PM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak

I got the chicken and monkey ones... but the heel/hammer?


57 posted on 02/04/2014 8:56:17 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak

Part of the problem is the change in culture.

If you want a war fighting Army, you’re not looking for guys that never drink, never whore around, never speed, have no tattoos, or got into a fight. You’re not looking for the GQ guy that looks good on a DA picture and has a perfect body mass index, doesn’t use foul language, use tobacco, or worst of all, is offensive to someone. A military that is concerned about winning when fighting isn’t concerned with the ratios of certain races or sexes and what ranks they have etc... Teddy Roosevelt recruited his Rough Riders in places like bars: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckhorn_Saloon_%26_Museum_%28San_Antonio%29

I suppose we no longer need a war fighting Army, and as many years before are more focused on the PC issues than anything related to fighting and winning. For myself, I would rather have my son serve with this guy who appears competent, than some of the clowns I served with at various times.


64 posted on 02/04/2014 9:12:49 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson