Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Additional sources describe the judge ordered the video turned over to the defense January 30. The prosecution has stonewalled. They were unwilling to hand over the video, claiming there are numerous hours of video and that their office is not equipped to turn around copies of the videos so quickly. FOXNews.com
1 posted on 02/04/2014 6:24:59 AM PST by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NautiNurse

Why should their be any question as to whether or not the defense should have access to a critical piece of evidence?

I have always believed, the shooter is probably guilty, (though we should wait until all the evidence is presented) but providing evidence like this to the defense should be totally routine. Makes me wonder if their is something in the video that the prosecution does not want the defense and the public to see.


2 posted on 02/04/2014 6:28:53 AM PST by Above My Pay Grade (The people have the right to tell government what guns it may possess, not the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse

It seems we have “surveillance video” of just about everything...


3 posted on 02/04/2014 6:31:00 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse
The prosecution has stonewalled.

It's only been a few weeks and the hearing coming up is only the bond reduction hearing. What they did to Zimmerman was stonewalling -- this hardly.

I posted an article on this matter a couple days ago but it was taken down for what ever reason I don't know but in it the prosecution claimed that he did not need to turn it over according to Floruda law until AFTER discovery but the judge told prosecutors to muster it over to them.

4 posted on 02/04/2014 6:35:04 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse

It tends to make you think the video either supports the defense or muddies up the State’s case.

If it supports the prosecution, and shows an obvious murder, it seems like they would have no problem releasing it.


8 posted on 02/04/2014 6:48:08 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise; Alas Babylon!; alexander_busek; Anton.Rutter; autumnraine; babygene; ...

Many of our specualtions about this case may be answered.


16 posted on 02/04/2014 8:38:35 AM PST by Albion Wilde (The less a man knows, the more certain he is that he knows it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

NBC News
Pasco County prosecutors say they will give the surveillance video from Wesley Chapel Cobb Theater shooting to the defense team Tuesday at a hearing.

The video captured the moment when, prosecutors said, a former police officer Curtis Reeves shot Chad Oulson in a dispute over texting about three weeks ago. Generally state laws ban the release of videos depicting a killing.

Judge Sumner who presided over the hearing, said he might want to see the video before making a ruling on it. The prosecutors said, the video itself was not graphic in nature.

Chad Oulson's widow Nicole said she didn't mind the video disclosure to the defense. Reeves' defense lawyers mentioned the video needed to be released to the media in the responsible way.

So far the video was not given to any media outlets. There is a temporary injunction in release of the video until Wednesday.


36 posted on 02/04/2014 10:40:55 AM PST by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse

HMMM. Suspicious?


44 posted on 02/04/2014 11:42:06 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse

Will there be previews before this video?


51 posted on 02/04/2014 2:16:12 PM PST by bramps (Go West America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse
Additional sources describe the judge ordered the video turned over to the defense January 30. The prosecution has stonewalled. They were unwilling to hand over the video, claiming there are numerous hours of video and that their office is not equipped to turn around copies of the videos so quickly.

This is bullshit. Just cut the vids to a DVD. It's not that hard.

 

56 posted on 02/04/2014 7:40:01 PM PST by zeugma (Is it evil of me to teach my bird to say "here kitty, kitty"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse
Live video of Feb. 5 court proceedings
58 posted on 02/05/2014 8:18:41 AM PST by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson