“Some people think he went crazy because this post is out of character for him, but it’s too late to ask him now.”
Which saddens me, because I wanted a chance to understand carlo3b’s point. I don’t think he meant what the initial post seemed to say. He appeared to be making a logical argument against abortion, saying the pro-aborts were illogical to say it’s a woman’s right to choose, but everyone else has no choice in whether or not to pay for her abortion or to raise the child via welfare for example.
It should go without saying that this is a privately owned site, and the owner makes it clear that he has zero tolerance for abortion. However, carlo3b—in a subsequent post—clearly said he was 100% opposed to abortion and would end it today if he could. I think he was claiming the pro-aborts won’t let us do that directly, so we have to use other means to slowly walk back abortion until we reach a point where we can outright ban it.
Good points.