Posted on 02/03/2014 5:44:47 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
Bill Nye may be “The Science Guy,” but Ken Ham is the “Answers in Genesis” man, and a debate between the two over the origins of life has nonbelievers and Christians wringing their hands.
Nye, host of a beloved television science series, and Ham, president of a creationist apologetics ministry, will meet at the Creation Museum, where Ham is also the president, on Feb. 4. In what some wags are calling “the Ham-on-Nye debate,” they will weigh this question: “Is creation a viable model of origins?”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Good answer! Never heard this question nor answer posited on the FR crevo debates.
In response to your suggestion:
The first Creationist book I read was ~ 1980.
It was a book of cynical misquotes and it even claimed that evolutionist falsifying their colleges past theories and claims was a reason it was not science, when that is why it is science compared to Creationism.
Clearly written for no-nothings.
I read a few more after that but it became pointless, they are not serious.
So please tell me of exactly what you’ve debunked in that book and what your credentials are [lie if you want to] b/c I specifically addressed one of your ‘debunking’ points yesterday where all you did basically was quote the arthor out of context - which any schoolyard brat can do but what does that really prove?
1) Hoax Book claims that existence of DNA and its weight is evidence of a unspecified Creation process over evo theories, when it is nothing more than evidence of itself and that someone named it.
2) Logical thinker who knows that light moves at a constant speed, which Creationists like Ham seemed to be ignorant of.
I already replied to item number 1 that you took completely out of context -why I oughta..., bang zoom to the moon...
When are you gonna start living up to your moniker and quit acting like them?
Item 2 not worthy of further discussion with you either.
Here's more cited ‘evidence of creation’ from your hoax book called ‘Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood: the Astronomical and Physical Sciences’ sections.
‘Each planet is unique.’
Unique??? I bet the know nothings in the audience who got their GEDs think this is a great suppressed scientific discovery.
Your book is a joke.
LOL, thanks for the message.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.