Posted on 02/02/2014 2:53:29 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion
Sen. Claire McCaskill on Tuesday slammed recent comments by Sen. Rand Paul tying President Bill Clintons infidelities to the so-called war on women as infuriating, saying Republicans keep getting into trouble talking about women.
The Missouri Democrat was talking about comments from Paul this Sunday on Meet the Press that Democrats decrying a war on women give Clinton a pass.
The Democrats one of their big issues is theyve concocted this, Republicans are committing a war on women, the Kentucky Republican said. I think, really, the media seems to have given President Clinton a pass on this. He took advantage of a girl that was 20 years old and an intern in his office. There is no excuse for that, and that is predatory behavior.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
LOL, I must have had a hiccup or something.
Roger that. You know, when the rats say that we are haters, at least in my case, they are right, I despise the bastards.
Don’t let up. We need to bust every Democrat myth the lieberal media has instituted.
When they start squealing it means you’ve grabbed them by the hindquarters. Don’t let go.
I hope you are right, but we live in Obamanation now. Nothing would surprise me anymore. Watch out for the Hildsbeast. If she goes up against a RINO, she will win, and we have had nothing but RINOs since Reagan. When I heard that guy say we were going to have a kinder and gentler nation, I was a little upset.
Paul of course is right. McKaskill is on the same plantation as the nlacks who blindly vote Democrat all tjr time. There is a section there for dumb white women.
The voter fraud would inflate number significantly. Huge fraud in KC and St. Louis.
If it infuriated Claire McCaskill then it must be the truth.
Sounds like he hit a nerve. :)
Claire McCaskill is stupid. So there, we are even.
hag would be a great improvement for granny mac
================================================
NYT 2/1--THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO PAUL / by Maureen Dowd
EXCERPT With the passage of time and a cascade of fawning magazine covers, (the impeched) Bill Clintons image has evolved, leaving the repellent sexual scandals a pentimento in a new, more magnetic portrait.
Now Rand, the 51-year-old Kentucky ophthalmologist-turned-senator has only been in Congress for three years. But Paul took dead aim at the former president, arguing that Bills legacy is brutified by Monica, when Bill wants his legacy to be ratified by Hillary.
Unruffled by the kerfuffle, Paul reiterated to me that he disdains the Democratic hypocrisy within the party that wants to blame Republicans for somehow not liking women, that somehow were this party that has some kind of war going on, and they have as a leader and one of the most prominent fund-raising people in their party still to this very day, a person who seems in some ways to have his own private war on women.
Paul aimed an asteroid at Planet Hillary on Meet the Press last Sunday. David Gregory asked Paul about the comment of his wife, Kelley Rand, in a Jason Horowitz profile of the senator in Vogue, that Bill Clinton should not be First Spouse, given his predatory behavior with Monica Lewinsky.
Paul backed up his wife, telling Gregory that there is no excuse for preying on a young intern and that it should affect historys view of the ex-president. While he said it was not Hillarys fault, he added that with the Clintons, sometimes its hard to separate one from the other.
On Fox News, after the State of the Union, Paul injected the word violence into the political bloodstream, noting that Bill Clinton, elevated to Democratic standard-bearer seems to be a guy that was committing the workplace kind of violence that we should all be opposed to.
CLINTON'S END GAME Monica had to be sacrificed for the greater good of the Clintons and feminist ambitions. Hillary was furious at Bill stories were leaked that he was sleeping on the couch but she also had to protect her political investment. If he collapsed, she was done. And she was going up to the Senate and eventually the Oval Office.
HILLARY WAS PART OF THE LEWINSKY COVER-UP It is not so simple for Democrats to cast Hillary as a victim; she was also part of the damage-control team to vouch for her husband and undermine his mistress. White House aides and other Democrats spread the word that Monica was a troubled young woman with stalker tendencies. Sidney Blumenthal, a senior White House adviser, later testified that Hillary told him that she was distressed that the president was being attacked, in her view, for political motives, for his ministry of a troubled person.
===================================================
Her husband was getting lubed by an intern---and Hillary was stoking her political ambitions by helping to cover-up Bill's predatory activities in the Oval Office.
<><> the tax-exempt Global Initiative Foundation uses shady financing;
<><> the tax-exempt Clinton Global Initiative had employed an active Muzzie terrorist, Gehad el-Haddad (The stupid Clintons did not know Gehad was Farsi for "jihad").
Gehad also knows how the Muslim Brotherhood launders money to finance terrorism, using "tax-exempt foundations."
==============================================
THE CLINTON FOUNDATIONS / MUSLIM TERRORISM CONNECTION --- The recent story that a Muslim terrorist was working at the Clinton Foundation AND conducting terrorist activities at the same time, explains why the Clintons just remade themselves into the hallowed "Clinton Family Foundation."
The "Holy Family."
The Clintons' shady proclivities are unveiled in the recent NYT story. Corruption, greed, entitlement, nepotism, cronyism. The Clintons didn't have a pot to *** in in Arkansas---never even had a home to call their own. Now they're multi millionaires.......the connivers have perfected the scam WRT gaming the govt system for themselves.
=====================================
There needs to be a thorough going-over of the three Clinton Foundations. We need to know who pays/funds the Clinton's lifestyle/political ambitions---- especially b/c Hillary is running for prez. It is important to know to whom the Clinton's are truly indebted.
NY POST EXCERPT ----The Bill Clinton Foundation has spent more than $50 million on travel expenses Bill Clintons foundation has spent more than $50 million on travel expenses since 2003, an analysis of the nonprofits tax forms reveal.....includes $4.2 million in 2011 for the William J. Clinton Foundation (to which Hillary and Chelsea are attached); $730,000 for the Clinton Global Health Initiative; and $7.2 million for the Clinton Health Action Initiative (CHAI).
==============================================
How many ways can the conniving Clintons use their name to launder money?
<><> The William J. Clinton Family Foundation......
<><> the Clinton Global Health Initiative......
<><> the Clinton Health Action Initiative (CHAI).
More importantly, what is the connection between Corzine's MF Global, Teneo (which paid Bill Clinton $50,000 per month), The Clintons multiple tax-exempt foundations, and Muslim money-Laundering?
Not at all unusual among today's "progressives".Hugo Chavez was completely broke when he took power but,14 years later,he died a *billionaire*.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.