Posted on 01/31/2014 6:35:54 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
The retirement of two of Nancy Pelosi's closest confidants is raising questions about whether the House Democratic leader's reign could be nearing an end.
The pending departures of Reps. George Miller and Henry Waxman mean Pelosi will have to do without her most trusted lieutenants if she decides to run again as Democratic leader.
The two fellow California Democrats helped engineer the major achievements of her speakership on healthcare and climate change, and could be counted on during good times and bad.
One former Democratic leadership aide described the loss as “a substantial changing of the guard” – a transition stirring speculation Pelosi will not stay on as leader despite her insistence that her work is not done.
“I have to think she's gone in '15 since it does not look like they take the House back,” the former leadership aide said.
Hours after Waxman announced his retirement, Pelosi said she was running for reelection and had already started the paperwork process.
Yet many Democrats read little into that decision.
They say that Pelosi leaving in 2014 was never a realistic option. She’s been a whirlwind fundraiser this Congress, breaking all previous records for the party with a $35 million haul in 2013 alone, according to her office. If she stepped aside, the morale for already out-of-power Democrats would crater.
Pelosi’s inner circle insists that the wave of veteran retirements — which also includes another friend in Northern Virginia Rep. Jim Moran (D) —is no indication she's also on her way out.
One source close to the minority leader said the exodus “says nothing” about her future plans.
“Pelosi isn't in Congress on a shift, but on a mission,” the source said. “She's raising record amounts of money and member dues participation is at 88 percent. She focused on hitting the trail hard and with her help the DCCC [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] is out-raising every other campaign committee. We will have the resources to put the House in play.”
Moran said Thursday that the string of retirements won't “diminish in any way” Pelosi's influence or effectiveness on Capitol Hill.
“Life goes on,” Moran said by phone.
Moran argued that the Democrats have plenty of talented young lawmakers ready to step in to fill the void created by the retiring veterans, which could make it easier for Pelosi to stay. Still, the 12-term Virginian acknowledged that it will be near-impossible to replace the institutional knowledge set to walk out the door.
"We do have a strong bench," Moran said. "But people like Henry and George, they are irreplaceable."
The 73-year-old Pelosi is famously private about her future plans, ever-insisting that she's focused on the current year's business — both the politics and the policy — but not beyond.
She defied the prognosticators who thought she would step out of leadership after the disastrous 2010 elections, which saw the Democrats lose 63 seats and control of the Speaker's gavel. And Pelosi disregarded the skeptics once more in 2012, when the Democrats picked up eight seats but not enough to retake the lower chamber.
A number of Democratic sources on and off Capitol Hill are guessing a potential presidential run by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would keep Pelosi – a tireless voice for women's empowerment – around at least through 2016.
“The first woman Speaker of the House would want to help the first woman president of the United States,” said one Democratic aide. “I don't see anything that shows she's heading for the exits.”
A second House Democratic aide echoed that message, saying it's "highly doubtful" Pelosi would step down ahead of a potential Clinton run.
"We're about to come up on an historic election, so it would be a strange time to throw in the towel," the aide said.
Pelosi herself has been effusive in praising Clinton ahead of what would be her second run for the White House.
“I pray that Hillary Clinton decides to run for president of the United States,” Pelosi said last May in Arkansas, comments that suggest she is excited at the possibility she could be a House ally of the first female president — assuming Clinton runs and wins.
Pelosi said Clinton “would be the most qualified person to enter the White House in modern history.”
“Now, that she happens to be a woman - that is a spectacular thing,” Pelosi said.
On a human level, sad to see. On a political level, ....!
...she should wonder into one of her vineyards some night and get attacked by one of her illegals she has working there...
Yup.
I ran into a similar person and nothing I did was ever good enough, she was contradictory as they come, and played good cop and bad cop very well on her own.
I wound up taking a lower paying in a manufacturing facility since my internal job prospects were dead.
She was entrenched and was the all powerful evil network administrator.
A nice mansion in Myanmar as she fights against extradition.
Rats are retreating very early on the House, signaling that they will divert the bulk of resources to holding the Senate.
That means that the GOP could actually pick up seats in swing districts and expand their majority.
Waxman and Miller hold Safe D seats, but there are probably close to a dozen competitive seats now held by Rats (a few of whom are retiring) that are ripe for the picking.
I understand that there is a vacancy in the position of Wicked Witch of the West for which Pelosi is eminently qualified.
Even more rats jumping the Obamacare sinking ship before 11/2014.
Sounds like the dems are about to see real trouble ahead when the upper dogs scramble something up?.
First, Pelosi isn’t nuts. The article lays out pretty well that she rakes in a massive amount of money by saying things that appeal to the actual nuts in the Dem base.
Second, she’s a ruthelessly brutal politician. And between her longtime familiy connections to the DC area (her dad was Mayor of Baltimore) and her tenure in national politics she knows where all sorts of bodies are buried. That’s how she got to keep her leadership position following 2010.
“As I’ve said before... there’s a very nice mental health care facility at Imola, CA, next to Napa..”
I own commercial property in Napa, CA, and there is NO such place as Imola, CA. There is a street in Napa named Imola, but that’s it. Perhaps the “mental health facility” to which you refer is the Napa State Mental Hospital, because it’s at the intersection of Imola and Soscol Avenues on the south side of Napa. But I agree, they should have a bed for her there right now.
Got it.. thanks.. I was actually born in Napa, but moved fr there when I was 8.. was thinking Imola was considered to be its own entity. In what part of town do you have your property?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.