Skip to comments.
Stanford law prof: Second Amendment is about restricting gun rights
The Daily Caller.com ^
| 1/30/2014
| Robby Soave
Posted on 01/30/2014 8:19:56 AM PST by rktman
A Stanford University law professor took the view that the Second Amendment permits strong gun control, telling the crowd that restriction has to be at the core of the right to carry a gun.
John J. Donohue, a member of the Stanford Law School faculty, made his remarks during a debate with attorney Donald Kilmer, an adjunct professor at Lincoln Law School of San Jose.
I support the right to self-defense, said Donohue during the debate, according to The Stanford Review. But that doesnt mean that you have a right to high-capacity magazines.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: didiots; guncontrol; highereducation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Comprehension skills.....ZERO Dumbass using the tired argument that the founders never envisioned today's modern weapons. But then again, he is a college professor so he must be real real smart. Either that or he slept at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
1
posted on
01/30/2014 8:19:56 AM PST
by
rktman
To: rktman
2
posted on
01/30/2014 8:21:45 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: rktman
And by his logic, censorship is completely constitutional as the founding fathers couldn’t have anticipated the computer and the internet when they wrote the 1st Amendment.
3
posted on
01/30/2014 8:24:40 AM PST
by
reegs
To: rktman
I was once foolish enough to think that lawyers were pretty sharp.
Thankfully, the Obamadork, the Holderfelon, and multiple “professors of law” have erased that incorrect conclusion.
4
posted on
01/30/2014 8:25:34 AM PST
by
Da Coyote
To: rktman
high-capacity magazines = putting more cartridges in the magazine than it will reliably feed.
Otherwise it is standard capacity.
5
posted on
01/30/2014 8:27:55 AM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
To: rktman
Whenever I want an explanation of the RKBA, I turn to a professor at Stanford (yeah, right.)
6
posted on
01/30/2014 8:28:19 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
To: rktman
Try the good old Global Warming fact strategy
7
posted on
01/30/2014 8:29:31 AM PST
by
molson209
(Hillary Clinton)
To: rktman
But that doesnt mean that you have a right to high-capacity magazines.
I guess I missed that part of the 2nd amendment wording. Must have been next to the section where it says the people can only own single shot muzzle loading flintlocks.
8
posted on
01/30/2014 8:31:23 AM PST
by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: Travis McGee
I enjoyed your review of
Savage Continent. I've read that one and Anne Applebaum's
Gulag and
Iron Curtain. I also recommend
Bloodlands. This quartet rounds out the murderous history of the crimes committed by two of the world's worst regimes - all in the service of a corrupt ideology in pursuit of absolute power.
The lesson on offer: there is only one way to stop these monsters and those who enable them. Only one way.
9
posted on
01/30/2014 8:36:11 AM PST
by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
To: rktman
Only a liberal could interpret “shall not be infringed” as advocating control.
10
posted on
01/30/2014 8:37:34 AM PST
by
IronJack
To: rktman
It makes sense - if you subscribe to the upside down world of liberals, where rights are wrong and wrongs are right.
11
posted on
01/30/2014 8:39:48 AM PST
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: rktman
I support the right to self-defense, said Donohue during the debate, according to The Stanford Review. But that doesnt mean that you have a right to high-capacity magazines.So, professor, that means that you do not have the right to be able to defend yourself against multiple assailants, or against government forces armed with high capacity magazines?
12
posted on
01/30/2014 8:42:51 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: rktman
Comprehension skills.....ZERO Dumbass using the tired argument that the founders never envisioned today's modern weapons. Exactly!
So, with that thought process do we now restrict the First Amendment because The Founders never envisioned the internet?
13
posted on
01/30/2014 8:42:52 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
Drop that “eye” phone and step away.
14
posted on
01/30/2014 8:46:03 AM PST
by
rktman
(Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
To: rktman
Well... Assuming this guy isn’t cut from the same cloth as Michale Bellisiles... Then he is clinically insane.
Of course, if he is, then he’s a fraud and needs to be fired immediately.
15
posted on
01/30/2014 8:46:57 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: rktman
Hi cap magazines.
The Prof should look up when the Puckle gun was invented.
16
posted on
01/30/2014 8:47:59 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: Dead Corpse
LOL! Right. Fire a college prof? Now that’s funny.
17
posted on
01/30/2014 8:48:17 AM PST
by
rktman
(Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
To: rktman
Everyone should just laugh, in people like these, faces. To actually believe the things they do, they have to deny reality. I can’t say they are “ignorant”, because these are educated people. Another word comes to mind that is perfect.
ASININE
1.
extremely stupid or foolish.
“Lydia ignored his asinine remark”
synonyms: stupid, foolish, brainless, mindless, senseless, idiotic, imbecilic, ridiculous, ludicrous, absurd, nonsensical, fatuous, silly, inane, witless, empty-headed; informal, half-witted, dimwitted, dumb, moronic
“an asinine stunt”
18
posted on
01/30/2014 8:50:36 AM PST
by
faucetman
( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
To: rktman
I guess we could just set him on fire.
I think the time has come for options to be considered.
19
posted on
01/30/2014 8:51:10 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: rktman
quote “restriction has to be at the core of the right to carry a gun”
hm... lets play a game liberals...
lets replace “carry a gun” with “have an abortion” (which isn’t even in the constitution” and see how you feel about such a statement!
20
posted on
01/30/2014 8:51:14 AM PST
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied .. the economy died.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson