Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four words in the ACA could spell its doom
The Washington Post ^ | 1-29-14 | George F. Will

Posted on 01/30/2014 5:37:41 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic

Someone you probably are not familiar with has filed a suit you probably have not heard about concerning a four-word phrase you should know about. The suit could blow to smithereens something everyone has heard altogether too much about, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (hereafter, ACA).

Scott Pruitt and some kindred spirits might accelerate the ACA’s collapse by blocking another of the Obama administration’s lawless uses of the Internal Revenue Service. Pruitt was elected Oklahoma’s attorney general by promising to defend states’ prerogatives against federal encroachment, and today he and some properly litigious people elsewhere are defending a state prerogative that the ACA explicitly created. If they succeed, the ACA’s disintegration will accelerate.

Because under the ACA, insurance companies cannot refuse coverage because of an individual’s preexisting condition. Because many people might therefore wait to purchase insurance after they become sick, the ACA requires a mandate to compel people to buy insurance. And because many people cannot afford the insurance that satisfies the ACA’s criteria, the ACA mandate makes it necessary to provide subsidies for those people.

The four words that threaten disaster for the ACA say the subsidies shall be available to persons who purchase health insurance in an exchange “established by the state.” But 34 states have chosen not to establish exchanges.

So the IRS, which is charged with enforcing the ACA, has ridden to the rescue of Barack Obama’s pride and joy. Taking time off from writing regulations to restrict the political speech of Obama’s critics, the IRS has said, with its breezy indifference to legality, that subsidies shall also be dispensed to those who purchase insurance through federal exchanges the government has established in those 34 states. Pruitt is challenging the IRS in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, and...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aca; andymccarthy; exchanges; georgewill; obamacare; obamacarescotus; obamacaresubsidies; representatives; scotus; scotusobamacare; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Balding_Eagle
Can you sight any references which confirm that is the correct use of the word ‘hear’?

LOL. Here is proof from a Google search: About 371,000 results (0.42 seconds) to a search for “I’m hear to help”

Can 370,000 Google references be wrong????

LOL 2.0.

21 posted on 01/30/2014 6:48:26 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The Governing Class is so invested in ObamaCare that the plain meaning of words is no barrier to inventing a way to keep imposing it on us. Just recall what Justice Roberts did to re-invent it as a legal tax.


22 posted on 01/30/2014 6:55:47 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

What is the “ACA?” Is it anything like ObamaCare? :)


23 posted on 01/30/2014 6:56:58 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not; Balding_Eagle

Lol! I must get more coffee. Spelling was once my friend.


24 posted on 01/30/2014 7:02:47 AM PST by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Can you sight any references which confirm that is the correct use of the word ‘hear’?

I love what you did there, lol!

25 posted on 01/30/2014 7:21:57 AM PST by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I don’t think this suit has a chance.

The exemptions provided by Sebelius and Obama to favored groups should provide the best legal fodder for nullifying Obamacare.

When you are forced to do something by the government that others are not forced to do, then equal protection laws are violated.

I believe that once someone pays a fine for not having insurance, they then have standing to sue under equal protection.


26 posted on 01/30/2014 7:24:16 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

I understand the subsidies to state exchanges ends after 3 years


27 posted on 01/30/2014 7:38:06 AM PST by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I understand the subsidies to state exchanges ends after 3 years

Which coincides with the end of Obama's term.

How utterly convenient.

28 posted on 01/30/2014 7:54:06 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (I forgot what my tagline was supposed to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

>>When you are forced to do something by the government that others are not forced to do, then equal protection laws are violated.<<

Hasn’t the tax code had exemptions built into it for decades? Under federal law, some are more equal than others.


29 posted on 01/30/2014 8:11:40 AM PST by BlueYonder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

‘Meant’ and ‘absolutely stated in the law’ are two VERY much different things; the judge should be buh-bye by now.

Even the States have no cajones to stand up to the Fed. leviathan


30 posted on 01/30/2014 8:21:07 AM PST by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deoetdoctrinae
Lol! I must get more coffee. Spelling was once my friend.

I have no issues with your spelling... lol.

31 posted on 01/30/2014 8:51:26 AM PST by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Obama (and the Dems) would absolutely LOVE to replace Congress with the IRS.


32 posted on 01/30/2014 10:43:18 AM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

 
33 posted on 01/30/2014 12:26:25 PM PST by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The call is coming from inside the house!

OK, that’s eight words.


34 posted on 01/30/2014 12:29:47 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

George went a whole article without an amusing anecdote about Roger Hornsby?

OK, that’s twelve words.


35 posted on 01/30/2014 12:32:29 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
What is the “ACA?” Is it anything like ObamaCare?

Obama Supporter: "We is not sure what ACA be - probly some union, or somethin, but whatever it be, Obamacare is much better. It's FREE!"

36 posted on 01/30/2014 12:45:29 PM PST by jda ("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson