Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

That’s only fair - since it was conservatives who invited the state into marriage in the first place - in exchange for a tax break. Once that happened, it was inevitable that everybody who could count to two would demand equal access.


8 posted on 01/27/2014 3:44:51 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Jeeves
That’s only fair - since it was conservatives who invited the state into marriage in the first place - in exchange for a tax break.

That is a bald faced lie, it predates the United States in the colonies, and of course thousands of years before that. Do you really think this nation was founded on a law that you had to be a member of a Christian church (or mosque) to marry?

Even at the federal level the first marriage law was passed in 1780, added to in 1794, and 1798, and 1802.

21 posted on 01/27/2014 3:57:24 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Jeeves

What tax break?


23 posted on 01/27/2014 3:58:42 PM PST by Fledermaus (If we here in TN can't get rid of the worthless Lamar, it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Nice try at blaming conservatives.

It’s Bush’s fault, right?


37 posted on 01/27/2014 4:07:54 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Jeeves; mrreaganaut

Government role in marriage existed long before that, for the protection of children and women.


109 posted on 01/27/2014 10:36:37 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian. I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Wow! I had no idea that our federal tax laws were retroactive to the beginning of time.

I seldom comment on ignorant statements by others but yours have to be at the all time top of the list.

A stable family is important to a stable society. Governments for thousands of years kept track of who married who and not just for tax reasons.

If you accept the idea a family of one man and one woman raising children is good, then it is a minor thing to give that family a tax break.

But governments has long been in the “marriage business” certainly longer then there were federal taxes.


176 posted on 01/28/2014 12:58:23 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I do not doubt that our climate changes. I only doubt that anything man does has any effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson