Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Except our trade with China can't take place without it

Baloney.

The answer is no. I did not bring up the subject of tariffs or advocate for raising or lowering them. There are other ways to impact trade.

By all means, elaborate.

You claimed I view job displacement in the US as a great thing. Where? If I need to express that again and again for you, just let me know. You seem to be having a bit of a comprehension problem.

I mention the 23% of our workers out of work and you tell me there's no need to review our trade policies.

So you lied when you claimed I view job displacement in the US as a great thing.

What is particularly amusing here, is that whichever word is used, the use of it reveals your agreement that the government moves corporate policy via tax manipulation.

Where did I disagree that high taxes impact corporate policy?

I am offended by your lies about me.

You probably are.

I am.

Nevermind if I have lied about you or not.

You made a claim about me. If you have proof, show it.

If you can't, admit you lied.

60 posted on 01/26/2014 8:17:59 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
Except our trade with China can't take place without it

Baloney.

Masterful argument in rebuttal.  It's on a par with the rest of your nonsensical offerings.

The answer is no. I did not bring up the subject of tariffs or advocate for raising or lowering them. There are other ways to impact trade.

By all means, elaborate.

No, I'm not going to expand this discussion further.  You haven't even been capable of agreeing with yourself in the same post.

You claimed I view job displacement in the US as a great thing. Where? If I need to express that again and again for you, just let me know. You seem to be having a bit of a comprehension problem.

I mention the 23% of our workers out of work and you tell me there's no need to review our trade policies.

So you lied when you claimed I view job displacement in the US as a great thing.

No, you support full blown Free Trade and the relocation of our jobs to foriegn nations when we have 23% unemployment in our nation, and another large portion of our populace earning far less than they used to.

You can't support moving their jobs away, and then claim that you don't view the jobs lost here in the U. S. as anything other than optimal.

If you can't grasp these concepts, and you have proven again and again you can't, why stay here and make yourself look this stupid.

What is particularly amusing here, is that whichever word is used, the use of it reveals your agreement that the government moves corporate policy via tax manipulation.

Where did I disagree that high taxes impact corporate policy?

And what has corporate policy been?  It has been to move jobs overseas.  Glad to see we're in agreement again, if only for a few seconds.

I am offended by your lies about me.

You probably are.

I am.

Well good.  I'm glad you are offended.  Poor thing that you are, I know you probably think I stole your socks too.,

Nevermind if I have lied about you or not.

You made a claim about me. If you have proof, show it.

If you can't, admit you lied.

I admit that you stated opinions supporting conclusions you didn't mean others to come away with.  Too bad.  Think before you post some of this nonsense,


64 posted on 01/26/2014 8:57:29 PM PST by DoughtyOne (ZERO is still zero, and John Kerry is a mock-puppet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson