Skip to comments.
Zimmerman tries to profit from Trayvon Martin slaying with painting; AP demands halt to sale
AP via Johnson City Press ^
| January 24, 2014
Posted on 01/25/2014 4:17:51 AM PST by don-o
ORLANDO, Fla. The Associated Press has demanded that George Zimmerman halt the sale of one of his paintings because the news agency says it directly copies an AP photo.
(Excerpt) Read more at johnsoncitypress.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ap; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Here's the reason that AP images may not be posted on FR.
1
posted on
01/25/2014 4:17:51 AM PST
by
don-o
To: don-o
How many pixels in a picture have to be different before there is no infringement?
To: don-o
He should countersue them
for their knowingly-false abominable “reports”
of “news” -— which were libel against him.
To: scrabblehack
Good question. They would have to prove that it indeed their copyright image.
4
posted on
01/25/2014 4:23:00 AM PST
by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: Diogenesis
iirc, he is suing several media. AP should be on the list.
The pic shown at the source looks more like a computer generated rendition of the photo that an actual painting.
5
posted on
01/25/2014 4:25:19 AM PST
by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: don-o
Here is how to thoroughly refute the APs case against GZ:
The picture that the AP took was done at a public appearance, with many other people both watching and taking pictures or videos.
For example, Ms. Coreys exact same expression can be found at about the 1:19 mark on this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UskHmQ5DHw
So even putting aside any other defenses (fair use, etc).. The APs copyright cannot extend to any use of that particular pose, since at this event it was simultaneously being captured and used by many other media sources on film and video.
Therefore, the ONLY thing that can be protected by the use of that copyright is the duplication and use of that EXACT picture
6
posted on
01/25/2014 4:25:54 AM PST
by
zencycler
To: scrabblehack
My Sweet Lord-He’s so fine. Nuff said
7
posted on
01/25/2014 4:27:28 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: zencycler
Or to put it another way, I’m sure that some AP photographer somewhere has taken a picture of Mount Rushmore. So if I stand in the same spot where the photographer was when he snapped that photo, and I paint what I see, am I violating his copyright?
8
posted on
01/25/2014 4:29:15 AM PST
by
zencycler
To: scrabblehack
Zimmerman just painted her, in a symbolic representation, without her makeup.
If I were that guy, I'd change my name to Jorge Carpintero and move to Sedona.
9
posted on
01/25/2014 4:40:55 AM PST
by
InABunkerUnderSF
(Explain again, why don't you need to fill out form 4473 to buy a pressure cooker?)
To: don-o
I’m sick of the AP whoring itself to advance commie bs. Covering Obama and his misuse of the “Bully Pulpit” to divide this country. Not “sourcing” publication but did this AP story have a by-line ? Who wrote this diatribe ?
10
posted on
01/25/2014 4:44:01 AM PST
by
mosesdapoet
(Serious contribution pause.Please continue onto meaningless venting no one reads.)
To: mosesdapoet
11
posted on
01/25/2014 4:48:57 AM PST
by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: don-o
12
posted on
01/25/2014 4:49:30 AM PST
by
JoeProBono
(SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
To: don-o
Zimmerman tries to profit from Trayvon Martin slaying............................... Like Sybrina Fulton??? Maybe George should trade mark his name too?
13
posted on
01/25/2014 4:57:30 AM PST
by
Bringbackthedraft
(Remember Ty Woods? Glenn Doherty ? Forgot already?)
To: don-o
All the Zimmeister has to do is declare painting a parody and he’s covered.
14
posted on
01/25/2014 4:57:35 AM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
To: don-o
Did they sue that punk who made the “Hope” image of the Clown?
To: don-o
Why can’t he just say it is a PARODY of their image, like satirists do with songs...or like costume shops do with “purple dinosaur” outfits (so they don’t have to pay “Barney” copyright fees)?
To: Jack Hydrazine
beat my question by two posts. :) congrats.
To: don-o
I’m surprised he doesn’t have a signature model LC9.
18
posted on
01/25/2014 5:17:42 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
To: don-o
George Zimmerman was handed a buttload of lemons by the
state and feds. Nice to see him making lemonade. He needs
to countersue AP for malicious conduct and threats.
The image he is selling is not a copy by ANY definition
of the word. It’s an original work based on an image that
AP published for the world to see. This is just more
persecution by the media at the behest of Holder and the rest of the criminals in Washington. He needs to sue the
living bejeebers out of AP.
To: don-o
My understanding was that you can create a painting of anything and the original painting does not violate a copyright. You only get in trouble if you mass produce copies. Zimmerman’s painting looks like enough of a departure from the original image that he shouldn’t have a problem anyway...shades of Warhol.
20
posted on
01/25/2014 5:24:19 AM PST
by
runfree
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson