Posted on 01/22/2014 4:33:05 PM PST by Mad Dawgg
The Supreme Court will decide whether or not it should be a crime for someone to purchase a gun for another person if both are legally allowed to possess a firearm.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnewsinsider.com ...
And remember the bonus army when people say it can't happen here
and American troops won't fire on citizens
.
Has gun buyer identification been brought to SCOTUS since prohibition of voter ID becoming normalized?
I think you're right; I believe they've been doing this constantly.
(Sandy Hook may've been a test-operation to see if they'd "moved the window" enough.)
Then they will complicate the process to the point it will be near impossible to comply without risking a federal felony.
It already is. See Three Felonies a Day.
My guess is they will eventually stop with trying to outlaw guns and use the Obamacare model instead and use taxes and loads of red tape to put gun ownership out of reach just like the already did with automatic weapons.
That's my supposition, too.
They can set it up as a "technical violation"/amnesty contract type deal wherein you are effectively admitting guilt and waiving the right to jury-trial.
Given the general acceptance of denying felons rights, they probably won't get a lot of blow back if the pick up a few "technical-felons" at a time.
“buyer’s intent to resell a gun”
Guns, being the most durable of goods in our society, may very well be purchased with the intent to sell some years or decades hence. In fact, the imputation may be made that ALL gun purchases are done with “intent to resell” (if for $0), as short of extreme cases the gun WILL outlast the owner. The question, as asked, places no upper limit on the timeframe of “intent”.
Ya...and what did they have to pay Randy Weaver in the end? And Randy Weaver was what now? He was found what in court?
Besides that..where in the hell did I say anything about sawed off shotguns? Weaver got into it by trying to sell a sawed off shotgun AFTER they showed him where the hell to saw it off at.
I WILL give anything I want to who I want to have it. END OF STORY! Got it?
Randy himself got like 100K and was found guilty of one count, failure to appear, for which Weaver was fined $10,000 and sentenced to 18 months in prison. He was credited with time served plus an additional three months, and was then released.
Good deal ehh? Got a prison sentence a 10k fine and two family members killed but hooray he got 100k for his trouble.
If you ever meet Randy ask him which he would rather have that 100K or his family back...
EVERYBODY should be responsible for their own actions.
Actually I have met him. And he wonders why your federal government agents havent been charged with MURDER!
And there is a WHOLE lot more to the story than that. In fact, he was set up and they murdered his wife...for one. Oh yes. Your brave federal agent couldnt tell through the scope...you might know the rest of the story if you cared.
Besides that DAWG..WTF is your problem? You a gubermint plant or something?
My s/s Ruger Mark II (with matching scope) will beat your Browning. Still a cool gun though.
“EVERYBODY should be responsible for their own actions.”
And that’s the way it USED to be, but lawyers need to earn a living! /s;)
So... who goes to jail for running guns under Fast and Furious?
you know after reading your last few posts it sets up a conundrum in my mind.
How could anyone with such a limited amount of understanding operate a standard computer...?
Tell the truth now. Your mommy is helping you type this on the big computer... right?
Actually, they were killed because Weaver wouldn't roll over and inform on neighbors and associates who were suspected of being raycists. The charge of manufacturing a short barreled shotgun was supposed to be the leverage by which they controlled Weaver, but he wouldn't play their game and just went home. No doubt someone in the BATF took offense at the refusal of their 'generous' offer to become a snitch. Call a spade a spade.
Revolt is coming.
There's already been some revolting posts on this thread.
It is on its way then!
It’s legal whatever they say.
“”Laws are made to be broken. And in the case of this one if not properly ruled, will be broken. I will give, whatever I want, to who ever I want, if they are fit to hold it.
Eff Them. All of Them.””
Thanks for saving me some typing.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.