[ClearCase_guy]

A "gun for women" sends entirely the wrong message, women's rights activist Ruchira Gupta told CNN. "Nirbhaya was a victim of violence caused by a desire of six men to project their masculinity through domination," she said. "Ultimately, we have to challenge the culture of domination and violence through nonviolence, not through introducing more tools of violence."

Translation: "I am a communist and I seek to culturally transform the nation and disarm the sheeple so that a totalitarian regime can be put in place, and people like myself can rule over serfs like you."

[ZirconEncrustedTweezers]

“Challenging the culture of domination and violence through nonviolence” is all very nice, but when you’re in imminent danger it’s much quicker to just shoot the SOB.

[Springfield Reformer]

Except that probably most of the radical deconstructionists known as feminists are conditioned by their “critical theory” education to actually believe that “hormonal inequality” really is the source of most human violence and unfair oppression.

Put the common threads together. They are: deconstructing football because it glorifies that hormonal inequality (same with the military), deconstructing heterosexual marriage because it perpetuates differentiated sex roles, deconstructing reproduction itself via “abortion rights” because women should have the same pleasure-to-consequences ratio as men. It’s only “fair.” Etc.

So at bottom, it’s a multifaceted deployment of the core Marxist credo of equality of outcomes in as many dimensions as possible. A society with no contrast, no color, no life. Peaceful? Maybe. Peaceful as the grave.