The States should tell the Federal Judges to go to hell and check for citizenship anyway.
But the conspirators know this will not be resolved in time for the next election cycle. Once illegals have already been registered, they will not have to qualify again.
The democrat controlled federal government is at war against the US citizen.
We need this.
When it has been shown that 23 year-olds can present themselves as 80 year-olds, as a thread showed last week, and be accepted by poll workers without question, then I’m doubtful than even photo I.D. is going to do much. “Yeah, two eyes a nose and a mouth, that’s you.”
Let’s hope this decision is brought back to the courts promptly as Justice Scalia said could be done. Unfortunately the courts are so packed with progressives, the Obama federal government apparatchiks and cooperating federal judges will likely be able to slow the appeals process to a snail’s pace.
It’s very clear now that many federal government officials in the Obama administration and in the civil service are now actively enemies of the American citizens.
Just go ahead and require proof of citizenship. The administration are criminals; treat them as such.
Here is the 2013 Sup Ct holding striking down the AZ law requiring proof of US citizenship for those seeking to vote in fed election.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-71_7l48.pdf
The *central committee* rejected three states’ requests to ask voters for proof of citizenship.
and all our asses goodbye!To begin with, the federal government has only those powers to protect voters which the states have expressly delegated to the feds via the Constitution. Such powers are evidenced by the 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th Amendments which expressly grant the feds the power to protect voters on the basis of race, sex, tax status and age respectively. Otherwise, the feds have no constitutional basis to prevent the states from prohibiting eligible citizens from voting on the basis of not being able to prove citizenship, or not being able to show valid photo ID for that matter.
Next, I don't understand why the states are asking the Election Assistance Commission for permission to do anything. More specifically, the Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in so-called "independent federal regulatory agencies" which the Election Assistance Agency appears to be. So Congress has a constitutional monopoly on federal legislative / regulatory powers whether it wants it or not imo. And by delegating federal regulatory powers to unelected federal bureaucrats like those running the EAC, corrupt Congress is wrongly protecting federal legislative powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of the previously referenced statutes imo.
Again, why are the states asking the Election Assistance Commission for permission to do anything since the states have granted the feds the specific powers to police voting only on the criteria of race, sex, tax status and age?
The states are just puppets of the fed. Not how the Constitution saw it.
What federal elections?
States and the people in those states hold elections.
Even the election for president is actually a vote for State representatives to the electoral college (a State office).
There is no popular vote for a federal government official. Congress is at worst a 50/50 state federal hybrid, but even that is debatable.
This issue should be controlled by the States.
Voter fraud is a major crime
All those aiding and abetting ought to be incarcerated
I saw a news video a couple of years ago, with Ayres & Dohrn in Beirut. This was before the events of Egypt. They were talking about having a Presidential vote without borders.