Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: smoothsailing
31 posted on
01/17/2014 2:24:45 PM PST by
Manic_Episode
(Some d..ays...it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps....)
To: smoothsailing
” - - - In fact, its gotten so bad, the operative said, that some donors have started looking back fondly on the good old days of 2012: You know what a lot of them say to me? I think we need Mitt back. - - - “
Yes, indeedy, those GOP Loyalists sure do love to lose their money and every single election !
32 posted on
01/17/2014 2:25:26 PM PST by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: smoothsailing
I think we need Mitt back
33 posted on
01/17/2014 2:26:09 PM PST by
Red Badger
(Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
To: smoothsailing
That’s the answer - Romney/McCain or vice versa.
34 posted on
01/17/2014 2:26:45 PM PST by
tips up
(Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.)
To: smoothsailing
I know my view is not popular, right now, but if we could get the Mitt who came out in that first debate, forceful, on point, highly opinionated, unapologetic. If THAT Mitt could be the candidate, and stay in Bad-A##-Cop mode for 70% of the time, then yes, I would consider it. Mitt has lots of money management abilities that we need right now. I think the Dems and Tell-Me-What-To-Think Rinos, are piling on Christie unfairly, and ignoring all of Obama’s scandals and screw ups, but, I’m not terribly distressed to see Christie put through the ringer by his so called friends across the aisle. Just the other day, even Bruce Springsteen, Christie’s BBF told him where to go and what to eat when he got there. Et- Tu, Bruce?
To: smoothsailing
I don't see it. The election is over two years away. Some people thought Christie would be the answer, but was anybody really that invested in him yet? Weren't there enough doubts about him for even the GOPe to hold back?
Most people are still at the "shopping around phase" and in the few weeks since this bridge thing started getting play in the media, they've had time to back away from any committment to Christie. So, no, "panic" is an exaggeration.
36 posted on
01/17/2014 2:28:43 PM PST by
x
To: smoothsailing
No moderate republican will win the whitehouse!
To: smoothsailing
This is the dumbest group of people ever assembled.
38 posted on
01/17/2014 2:31:30 PM PST by
ilgipper
(Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
To: smoothsailing
39 posted on
01/17/2014 2:32:15 PM PST by
Darren McCarty
(Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
To: smoothsailing
Three easy steps to Romney 3.0: He comes out strong for amnesty to mend fences with Latino voters; he finally decides to ix-nay the makers and takers etoric-rhay, and of course he chooses Mike Huckabee to be his VP. Cant. Miss.
...You mean the Romneybots might come back? BLECH! I think I still have all my Romney-mocking stuff running around, I'm willing to not vote for him a second time.
41 posted on
01/17/2014 2:34:30 PM PST by
arderkrag
(An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
To: smoothsailing
If a RINO is the answer, it is always the wrong question!
42 posted on
01/17/2014 2:35:27 PM PST by
aMorePerfectUnion
(Truth is hate to those who hate the Truth)
To: smoothsailing
Why should the GOP-e fret over fatso’s foibles. They still have ryan, rubio, jebbush and many others who want to go along to get along.
43 posted on
01/17/2014 2:38:49 PM PST by
grumpygresh
(Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
To: smoothsailing
It won’t be Mitt. Ann Romney was disgusted and he’s not going to want her to go through that again.
To: smoothsailing
pshhh. The Mittbot infestation was what made me cross HotAir off my reading list. Figures they would start this.
45 posted on
01/17/2014 2:41:45 PM PST by
KGeorge
(Till we're together again, Gypsy girl. May 28, 1998- June 3, 2013)
To: smoothsailing
Jeb Bush is ready to take the fall and throw the election to Cankles.
To: smoothsailing
Without or without Bridgegate, I prefer Romney to Christie, especially after Christie stabbed Romney in the back over Hurricane Sandy. Would be nice to get someone a little more conservative, though.
53 posted on
01/17/2014 2:57:28 PM PST by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: smoothsailing
What a bunch of effing losers.
54 posted on
01/17/2014 2:57:39 PM PST by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: smoothsailing
Makes no difference. Mitt or Chris lose.
63 posted on
01/17/2014 4:08:20 PM PST by
RobinOfKingston
(Democrats--the party of Evil. Republicans--the party of Stupid.)
To: All
who do they think is gonna vote for Romney this time? / rhetorical
I believe strongly that the GOP wants the RATS to win.
None of this matters to me since I won’t be voting for anyone supported by the Uniparty.
Next vote I cast will be for a good solid patriotic Tea Party candidate.
/not interested in any suggestion that I must vote for a GOP RINO for whatever reason! I am not a RepubliCANT.
67 posted on
01/17/2014 4:15:00 PM PST by
uncitizen
(Obama said 'period', but he meant 'asterisk'.)
To: smoothsailing
Neither of these Rovetards, mittens or fatso, should ever be allowed anywhere near a Republican primary ever - which means they will be pushed front and center (far left of center) by the GOPtards.
69 posted on
01/17/2014 4:18:38 PM PST by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson