I think that's the very same type of hyperbole you're accusing Glenn of.
"And unsure of his homosexual stances. Among other things."
Admittedly, I don't get to listen to Glenn's show in its entirety every day as this work/job thing tend to interfere, but recently, about the only sympathy I've heard from Glenn towards gays has been in regards to a Russian bureaucrat saying they should be thrown in ovens, and today he played an audio-clip of some DA from the 1950s who was pledging to hunt down gays and throw them in jail. I happen to agree with Glenn that both of those were a little excessive, but I hardly consider myself as being sympathetic with, or supportive of the homosexual agenda. I've read some commentary about Beck supporting gay marriage, but haven't heard his direct commentary on it, and I prefer to hear such things from the source, in context, so I can't really comment on it, but if he did, I certainly disagree with him on that count, but given the totality of his efforts in organizing mass conservative events, redefining conservative media with the Blaze, bringing together Levin, Hannity and himself for more focused efforts and churning out volumes of pretty well researched and written books, I'd say that his "1% result" is more than most people achieve in a lifetime.
And his 1% also causes a bunch of chaos. Sure he does good. And he should be commended when he does. But burying your head in the sand about the far more frequent times he does not deliver on his wild speculative and hyped to hell claims isn’t beneficial and just encourages more of it.
Which distracts conservative every time he does it. When they could be making real progress.