Posted on 01/13/2014 6:27:32 PM PST by machogirl
Kool-aid drinker... Nothing else to say to you.
Who is the Jonestown-Kool-Aid drinker? I went back to the post?
It was my first time at the post, btw. It constantly amazes me how many people on our side are unwilling to accept that the enemy is capable of anything. Obama is a lying Marxist dirtbag and he is willing and able to do whatever it takes to hang on to power. Our only hope is the people, and the people have no chance if they won’t learn and accept the truth about our “leader.”
Have you heard, “We got guns”? That means, They won’t do that. The fact that the ,”They can’t do that”, is happening on a daily basis, is ignored. The theory is, if we refuse to acknowledge it[deny], it won’t happen.
Ditto that about Barry. He and his cronies won’t be the losers, America will be. I just hope it’s not too late.
I've posted here on three basic topics. None of which have to do with Obama per se.
The first was to challenge the notion that there is some "two citizen parent requirement" as to the Constitutional term "natural born citizen. This issue pertains to Obama, but as well potentially to Rubio, Jindal, and Cruz.
The second was to observe that when the Hawaii Dept. of Health, per Dr. Onaka, verifies --
“[I] verify the following:
1. A birth certificate is on file with the Depatment of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.” --
That such in any legal context is going to get taken a face value and confirmation of the point at issue, notwithstanding the tortuous logical processes some employ to make the claim that Dr. Onaka didn't verify a Hawaiian birth.
The third point I've commented on is that the idea there was some conspiracy to crash a plane in order to "silence" Loretta Fuddy is just pure nuttiness. Again, this has nothing to do with "defending Obama." It's more about challenging some people's fuzzy thinking processes. I'm hardly the only one at Freep to point out the nuttiness of that conspiracy theory.
Are you getting paid for it?
Speaking of silly ideas . . .
I hope so, for all the trouble you are going to.
I posted two six line comments to you. Really not all that much as these things go.
What’s the problem? Surely POTUS with all his education can manage this simple task. Let’s see it.
That was done. The problem is that you can't show a paper copy to 300 million people at once. So these things were scanned and put online. That's where the "questions" arose.
Or is the next thing to happen, the Dept. of Vital Statistics in Hawaii going to ‘accidentally’ blow up?
I will wager you (or anyone) nothing like that happens.
Any takers?
Asking if you are getting paid is not silly at all. There are paid trolls, probably funded by organizations like Media Matters, that go on forums such as this to spew propaganda and try to convince people not to believe their lying eyes.
When I referred to ‘all the trouble you are going to’ I was talking about your history of long-winded commenting and not just on this thread. I would dare to say 9 out of 10 people skip over long-winded comments such as yours. Have you ever heard the phrase ‘less is more’?
I don't accept the photo shopped forgery they put up on the WH site. Obama has never shown the original micro finch copy of his BC and if he would, I want it checked out by experts since apparently he would rather lie than breathe.
You paint with a rather broad brush.
*I haven't ever discussed one bit about the Selective Service.
*I haven't discussed the BC, other than noting the legal significance of Hawaii's verification of the same. Frankly, I consider the WHLFBC to be one large irrelevancy.
*As to the SS#, I've pointed out only that in Orly's case the SSA has twice indicated that there is no connection between the "042" SS# and some guy named "Bounel" who was born around 1890. So Orly Taitz's pet theory is grounded in nothingness. Pointing out that a particular claim fails for want of evidence is hardly "defending Obama."
There are paid trolls, probably funded by organizations like Media Matters, that go on forums such as this to spew propaganda and try to convince people not to believe their lying eyes.
And you believe that based on actual proof? (If so, what proof?) Or because you've heard it repeated so many times online you accept it as true?
When I referred to ‘all the trouble you are going to’ I was talking about your history of long-winded commenting and not just on this thread. I would dare to say 9 out of 10 people skip over long-winded comments such as yours. Have you ever heard the phrase ‘less is more’?
My longest posts were those that demonstrate how U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark renders the "two citizen parent" argument for NBC utter nonsense. When one is trying to digest a 50+ page Supreme Court opinion, it's both helpful and necessary to quote from and explicate many portion of the opinion. That post was directed at a particular poster (who himself has been known to make long posts). Suffice it to say, I proved my point in that dialogue.
On some subjects, pithy one or two-liners are not adequate, though you may feel they are.
Obama has never shown the original micro finch copy of his BC and if he would, I want it checked out by experts since apparently he would rather lie than breathe.
And my surmise is that if those experts came back and said "it's all A-OKAY and genuine" the cry would be that the experts were bribed or intimidated into giving that opinion.
You’re really needy aren’t you? Bless your heart.
And sometimes less isn't more, it's just less. Or, as the above shows, totally pointless.
I answered your questions about the supposed "accidental heart attack." I trust you learned at least that much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.