They don't want a ballot issue because this state isn't a fan of killing babies.
To: Darren McCarty
. . . but rather than put our resources or efforts into a one-off referendum or initiative, the goal will be to create a broad strategy that addresses this growing frustration with politicians involving themselves in women's lives."What a fancy way to say that they just weren't going to collect enough signatures . . .
2 posted on
01/13/2014 2:17:54 PM PST by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Darren McCarty
TRANSLATION: “A defeat at the ballot box looks likely.”
3 posted on
01/13/2014 2:20:42 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
To: Springman; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; madison10; ...
"The timing is just not right for a referendum or initiative at this point,"
In other words, Michigan is slowly slipping out of their grasp.
Michigan legislative action thread
4 posted on
01/13/2014 2:22:13 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Darren McCarty
“Reproductive rights” and “Abortion rights” are diametrically opposite terms-
One is the antithesis of the other.
Abortion is an anti-reproductive act.
This writer needs to get a dictionary.
5 posted on
01/13/2014 2:33:27 PM PST by
bunkerhill7
("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson