To: UB355
Why should Congress get involved??
2 posted on
01/12/2014 1:08:12 PM PST by
GeronL
(Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
To: GeronL
Why should Congress get involved??
My thoughts exactly.
5 posted on
01/12/2014 1:10:04 PM PST by
SpaceBar
To: GeronL
The WC meteorologists are gorebal warming nitwits.
35 posted on
01/12/2014 1:24:55 PM PST by
boomop1
(term limits will only save this country.)
To: GeronL
The weather channel is kind of egotistic if they think people have no other venue to get weather information from. And isn’t Congress getting involved with private business disputes the last we want?
43 posted on
01/12/2014 1:29:13 PM PST by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: GeronL
We already have national system for disasters. The weather channel is a private business.
BTW, I never watch the channel. It could get dropped and I’d never notice it.
57 posted on
01/12/2014 1:48:15 PM PST by
dhs12345
To: GeronL
Are they better then storm Doppler 3 locally?
78 posted on
01/12/2014 2:51:46 PM PST by
personalaccts
(Is George W going to protect the border?)
To: GeronL
Why should Congress get involved??Heh. Got in a heated argument with a FReeper (!) because he thought Congress should make so-called à la carte channel selection the law [THE LAW, I TELL YOU!].
He just could not understand my resistance to that when it was obviously such a good idea. That's where we are now. If you favor something, then government should do it, by golly.
82 posted on
01/12/2014 3:12:37 PM PST by
BfloGuy
( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson