The NY Times editorial staff is well over 50% homosexual as a result of selective clustering over 2 decades.
The much larger part of the article you posted is focused on republicans and their sources. The small remaining focus is on democrats of which the major effort in that small part focuses on homosexuality. Most of the vacuous reporting on democrat fundraisers is without substance rather is inserted to hide the partisan nature of the piece.
This is not investigative journalism. This is a call-to-arms for homosexual groups and their wealthy benefactors to focus on states because their hold there is tenuous and highly vulnerable.
A traditional marriage amendment in the future is a certainty and the number of states needed to block it is not a lock. A handful of states that are in the blue homosexual column today can be easily flipped in the near future.
Hence, homosexual fascists are called to divert more resources to the states.
Never again give credit to the NY Times as it is a direct insult to intelligence.
Never again give credit to the NY Times as it is a direct insult to intelligence."
Sorry, but for you to read that long article and focus solely on the small part about homosexuals tells me more about you than I want to know.