You do know we don’t care here. That is the point, we don’t use a ‘caste’ system, or as I called it a ‘castle’ system, where she is the Queen while her ‘servant’ is not paid according to the contract she entered. Her own ‘caste’ as defined from her society is irrelevant here, and that is the entire point of our society.
If you don’t use a “caste system” in the US, then why are American cities comprised of areas with distinct / separate majority ethnicities, and not a uniform distribution?
You do know that the “caste system” you mention in the Indian context is relevant there to the same extent, don’t you? Officially, it’s illegal to discriminate in India for caste.
you said “a caste driven society” — however, that’s not true any more in the urban areas and for that matter, it is not relevant in this case, so why did you bring it up?