Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
...Would you begrudge somebody the benefit of the doubt? Would you want protocols to write off people who may have had a pulse just moments ago, or whose pulse is so faint it can’t be detected without the instruments? The protocols are put in place so that tragic mistakes aren’t made.

I've been sitting here thinking about what you wrote, I think the answer is obvious, something appears to have been NOT done right, but just because the rescuer may not have followed 'protocols' (I hate that word, it reminds me too much of the Nazi's whose endless instruction manuals assisted in the rounding up and the death of millions) doesn't mean she was deliberately allowed to die. Does it?

Whatcha gunna do? Charge the man with manslaughter/gross negligence or what? I honestly can't see that happening, there will always be occasions when people use their own judgement during a moment when time is of the essence, and bugger the manual. That's all just imo of course, and opinions is all we've got.

btw, did you see that small flash of purple on the left and right of the composite? That's the from the garment she was wearing that very same day. I think it's almost conclusive that the 'missing woman' was Fuddy herself.

626 posted on 01/16/2014 3:04:54 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

I understand where you’re coming from.

I think Ornot did what he was told to do, and he believed it was for a good reason. He was not trying to kill anybody, and saying he had obeyed protocols when he hadn’t was part of what he had to do. I believe his conscience was clear.

The people who told him to do it have some answering to do though.


627 posted on 01/16/2014 4:20:43 PM PST by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks

There’s no way that hair is Fuddy’s, IMHO.


628 posted on 01/16/2014 4:23:09 PM PST by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks

Also, if that’s Fuddy then why were we told she had drifted to about a mile from shore?

No matter how you slice it the stories don’t add up. We’re being conned.

Everybody is so averse to “conspiracy theories”, but even without this lady by the shore (who doesn’t fit the story or the hair for Fuddy) there are still too many women just in that space of time where Rosa and MW1 are by the wing, because right after that, while Fuddy was still with Yamamoto by the plane, this woman that Puentes helped (MW3) popped up. That’s 4 women at one time, where there were supposed to only be 3. And the NTSB, USCG, Schuman, and Kawsaki all played along with the lie. THAT is what we deserve to be given an answer for: Why are they lying to us?


630 posted on 01/16/2014 4:33:09 PM PST by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson