Posted on 01/10/2014 4:00:29 AM PST by Texas Fossil
The Senate is poised to confirm Robert L. Wilkins to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit — the final battle in a bruising war between the White House and Senate Republicans over the "second highest court in the land."
The D.C. Circuit deals with cases against the federal government. Anyone who has a complaint with a regulatory agency or wants to challenge an excess of the federal government usually winds up there.
>snip
In November, Obama effectively gained control of the 11-member court when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid triggered the "nuclear option" — reducing the threshold needed to stop a filibuster from 60 votes to a simple majority.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Yep, he is looking to start a civil war so he can be king, term limits would no longer apply.
If they gain and keep complete control, there will be no spectators. They are not benign despots. These are truly evil vermin.
We saw these Fascists before, not that long ago. Less than 1 generation ago.
He had best be careful for what he wishes.
Agree.
If we have become a European Socialist nation, why didn’t we become Norway? Those guys have no deficit and the government has stashed away about $170 thousand for each of its citizens from their oil money and subsequent investments. I was there a few years ago, a beautiful place. But no, we have to model ourselves after Greece....
Thanks.
Read “unintended consequences”.
Right. You described point “A.” Tell me about the steps to arrive at “Z,” freedom.
Tell me the future events that will happen.
“The power grab continues. Obozo can see that he is being exposed and must suppress exposure in court at all cost.”
Under the De Facto Officer Doctrine, a plaintiff addressing a grievance with the Federal Government can object to an appointee by an ineligible President. It is done with a motion to the Court:
MOTION FOR HEARING TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II, DISQUALIFY THE HONORABLE (Name of Judge) DUE TO A TRESPASS UPON THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
COMES NOW, Plaintiff (Name of Plaintiff) and moves this Court to conduct a hearing on the eligibility of the President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama II to make valid appointments to this Court and the qualification of The Honorable (Name of Judge) to hear this case upon objection by Plaintiff under the De Facto Officer Doctrine and states and alleges the following, to wit:
1) Plaintiff OBJECTS to all laws, rules, regulations, appointments, and executive orders of the ineligible President Barack Hussein Obama II;
2) Appointments made by an ineligible President of the United States are a trespass upon the United States Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, known as the Appointments Clause;
3) United States Citizens who obtained their citizenship by application of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Pub.L. 82–414, 66 Stat. 163, as amended prior to January 20, 2009), and issued a Certificate of Naturalization at anytime in their lifetime are ineligible to hold the Office of the President of the United States, Schneider v. Rusk 377 U.S. 163 (No. 368), quoting Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 827. And see Luria v. United States, 231 U.S. 9, 22; United States v. MacIntosh, 283 U.S. 605, 624; Knauer v. United States, 328 U.S. 654, 658.;
4) Natural born citizenship status is not defined completely, but is not held by a person who is not a U.S. citizen, not held in perpetuity once established; nor is it held by a former U.S. citizen who has been issued a Certificate of Loss of Nationality;
5) President Barack Hussein Obama II was issued a Certificate of Naturalization in 1983 after living in the United States of America as a Legal Permanent Resident Alien from 1971 to 1983;
6) President Barack Hussein Obama II was inaugurated in January, 2009 and January, 2013 and sworn into office by Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court;
6) President Barack Hussein Obama II currently holds the Office of the President of the United States and is trespassing upon the United States Constitution because he does meet the Eligibility Clause to hold the Office of the President of the United States, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution;
7) The appointments of an ineligible President currently occupying the Office of the President of the United States and are objectionable under the De Facto Officer Doctrine, Ryder v. United States, 515 U.S. 177 (1995);
Plaintiff prays for relief and requests a hearing to determine the eligibility of President Barack Hussein Obama II, the validity of appointments of an ineligible President after an objection is lodged while the usurper holds the office, and for the Honorable (Name of Judge) to recuse from this case.
Would be nice if it was that simple.
The issue is constrained by the powers who put him in office.
He is a Post Turtle.
Is obvious he does not belong there.
He did not get there by himself.
He does not know what to do while he is there.
Question is what fools put him there.
Those fools are not solely the marginal information voters and useful idiots. Voter fraud was committed using outsider’s money.
And so a Tyrant slowly consolidates his power.
The bastard needs to be impeached, all his appointments need to be removed and each and every bill he signed voided.
I’ve heard of that.
Yes
Sadly, until there is a revolt, nothing will happen to fix this dictatorship :/
One step closer to the war they only think they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.