Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilovesarah2012

Sooooo... If smoking, overeating, and extra-large soft-drinks are documented health risks linked soley to optional behavior that push additional costs for health care on to others and the broader markets and are to be banned or taxed out of existence - and if the reasoning of an entire health care overhaul were the avoidance of behavior which places health at risk, & to reduce or control the additional costs... then I can see this 2% becoming the target of someone for reasons other than sexual preference... The risky behavior costs society too much, one might say.


8 posted on 01/09/2014 5:28:23 AM PST by Coffee... Black... No Sugar (I'm gonna' BICKER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coffee... Black... No Sugar

Yep, we’ve pointed that out all along, WRT nationalized healthcare.

“Risky” behaviors, ie, anything the left doesn’t approve of, will result in penalties for adding a burden to the healthcare system,

but MSM will not be included in this assessment,

because it furthers the agenda of the left.


11 posted on 01/09/2014 5:31:10 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee... Black... No Sugar

That’s it! Tax homosexuals!


13 posted on 01/09/2014 5:32:16 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee... Black... No Sugar
"taxed"

That is a capital idea and one I never thought of. If I couldn't think of it first, you sir are a genius.

29 posted on 01/09/2014 6:14:21 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson