Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68

Actually on the surface Kim went too far. If he can show they were indeed directly hostile to him, then no question he would have “self-defense” as a reason. However, in our ninny society, the mere fact that he apparently carried a firearm up to their unit will have everyone assume he had intent.

Regarding the diapers, especially, this matches my cleaning woman’s story about her neighbors. She and neighbors are the same persuasion. Amongst other issues, 1 of her neighbors she found tossing baby diapers into her yard (row house-type homes). She has fought and fought about it, where the woman acts like it’s not her throwing diapers and it must be something else. But she’s the only baby mama in the area and the fencing precludes wind just blowing it over.

The behavior is not shocking, and she has other stories that have her in tears and me laughing my head off!


16 posted on 01/08/2014 6:56:35 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel

De facto truth: self defense doesn’t apply when it’s an Asian defending himself from “blacks”.


50 posted on 01/08/2014 8:13:36 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson