Skip to comments.
Does the right need a Rachel Maddow?
The Daily Caller ^
| January 6, 2014
| Matt K. Lewis
Posted on 01/07/2014 1:49:28 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Comments?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
2
posted on
01/07/2014 1:51:11 PM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We have plenty of Maddows on the right. What we really need is a
NETWORK CAMERA
On our good speakers wishing to push this country to the right slowly!!!!!
3
posted on
01/07/2014 1:51:14 PM PST
by
Yaelle
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Maddow is an idiot. She believed that the Kentucky Tea Party murdered a census worker.
She thinks that Gun Control is a political winner for at risk Democrats.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5
posted on
01/07/2014 1:51:25 PM PST
by
Sybeck1
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What need does the right have for a lying sack of sow sh!!?
6
posted on
01/07/2014 1:53:15 PM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Filthy liars will always get their comeuppance.
Maddow is a vile stench.
We don’t want or need that. Truth always, always wins out in the end.
7
posted on
01/07/2014 1:53:44 PM PST
by
A message
To: 2ndDivisionVet
8
posted on
01/07/2014 1:54:03 PM PST
by
FreeAtlanta
(Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is that a trick question ?
Why would the right need a smug elitist moonbat....?
9
posted on
01/07/2014 1:54:36 PM PST
by
Popman
("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
10
posted on
01/07/2014 1:55:36 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Right already has one:
11
posted on
01/07/2014 1:56:48 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(We want our pre-existing HEALTH INSURANCE back!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If I wanted to be like them, I’d be them.
12
posted on
01/07/2014 1:58:26 PM PST
by
RichInOC
(Palin 2016: The Perfect Storm.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Rachel is very intelligent. That being said, I can’t understand why she is so far left. Most liberals are not very smart. I am hoping that one of these days she wakes up and sees the light.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We couldn’t possibly find a woman as repulsive in every sense of the word.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
15
posted on
01/07/2014 2:02:10 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
16
posted on
01/07/2014 2:02:18 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
To: Da Coyote
Put the repulsive Ms R against Anne Coulter and watch the liberal be sliced, diced, chopped, cooked, and served on a platter.
There is no comparison.
In any sense.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Who is he?
And why would someone name their boy Rachel?
18
posted on
01/07/2014 2:02:54 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We’ve got Limbaugh, Levin and a host of most excellent Conservatives with microphone access.
We don’t need no stinking Madow on the Right.
She has like
. what? a hundred or so people watching her miserable show?
19
posted on
01/07/2014 2:04:00 PM PST
by
INVAR
("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does anybody need a crazy broad in ugly glasses?
20
posted on
01/07/2014 2:04:37 PM PST
by
discostu
(I don't meme well.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson