To: Baynative
Hope not, then that would create at least 10 new liberal senators.
3 posted on
01/07/2014 12:44:20 PM PST by
12th_Monkey
(In an alternate universe Obama still dips ice cream)
To: 12th_Monkey
Hope not, then that would create at least 10 new liberal senators.
Not true, at least a couple of those states would be right of center, and Silicon Valley would probably alternate between RINO and Prog-Dem.
6 posted on
01/07/2014 12:47:04 PM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(Five years, my brain hurts a lot.)
To: 12th_Monkey
Six new Liberal Senators, maybe, but the remainder would almost certainly reflect the much more conservative values of the “red” parts of California.
Splitting California roughly along the San Andreas Fault may be a more rational way to divide that tormented land. Of course, a fairly wide buffer zone would have to be established as well, to be sure San Francisco would not be accidentally included in part of the “northeastern” section.
20 posted on
01/07/2014 12:59:59 PM PST by
alloysteel
(Those who deny natural climate change are forever doomed to stupidity. AGW is a LIE.)
To: 12th_Monkey
Not all 6 would be liberal. Depending on how they split it up, it could mean about 4-6 new Rats and 2-4 new Pubs.
41 posted on
01/07/2014 1:25:39 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(The War on Drugs has been used as an excuse to steal your rights. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: 12th_Monkey
“Hope not, then that would create at least 10 new liberal senators.”
If you believe that, you simply know nothing about the demographics in California!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson