Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is no big deal ...

1 posted on 01/05/2014 1:57:18 AM PST by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Zakeet

I wonder what God thinks of the DOJ and NYT lying through their teeth in order to try to discredit the sisters by attempting to manipulate the public and make the sisters look like they’re crazy, stupid, silly, and stubborn.

I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes for all the tea in China.


2 posted on 01/05/2014 2:01:20 AM PST by BlessedBeGod (Democrats are Cruz'n for a Bruisin' in 2016. / Obama=Unspeakable Audacity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Ruh Roh...

They’re wearing habits. They’ve got backing. Bo’s in for a real fight. I don’t think he’s up to it


3 posted on 01/05/2014 2:02:47 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

The problem I have with this is the litigants and the courts assume religious freedom is exclusively for religious groups. The freedom of religion is an individual’s right. If my religious beliefs tell me something is immoral then I have the same rights as a Catholic order does to decline the goverent’s mandate.


4 posted on 01/05/2014 2:11:36 AM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
This quote from John Paul II's Evangelium Vitae ("The Gospel of Life") helps one understand the nuns' motivation (emphasis and [comments] mine):

74. The passing of unjust laws often raises difficult problems of conscience for morally upright people with regard to the issue of cooperation, since they have a right to demand not to be forced to take part in morally evil actions. Sometimes the choices which have to be made are difficult; they may require the sacrifice of prestigious professional positions or the relinquishing of reasonable hopes of career advancement. In other cases, it can happen that carrying out certain actions, which are provided for by legislation that overall is unjust, but which in themselves are indifferent, or even positive, can serve to protect human lives under threat. There may be reason to fear, however, that willingness to carry out such actions will not only cause scandal and weaken the necessary opposition to attacks on life, but will gradually lead to further capitulation to a mentality of permissiveness.

In order to shed light on this difficult question, it is necessary to recall the general principles concerning cooperation in evil actions. Christians, like all people of good will, are called upon under grave obligation of conscience not to cooperate formally in practices which, even if permitted by civil legislation, are contrary to God's law. Indeed, from the moral standpoint, it is never licit to cooperate formally in evil. Such cooperation occurs when an action, either by its very nature or by the form it takes in a concrete situation, can be defined as a direct participation in an act against innocent human life or a sharing in the immoral intention of the person committing it. This cooperation can never be justified either by invoking respect for the freedom of others or by appealing to the fact that civil law permits it or requires it. Each individual in fact has moral responsibility for the acts which he personally performs; no one can be exempted from this responsibility, and on the basis of it everyone will be judged by God himself (cf. Rom 2:6; 14:12).

To refuse to take part in committing an injustice is not only a moral duty; it is also a basic human right. Were this not so, the human person would be forced to perform an action intrinsically incompatible with human dignity, and in this way human freedom itself, the authentic meaning and purpose of which are found in its orientation to the true and the good, would be radically compromised. What is at stake therefore is an essential right which, precisely as such, should be acknowledged and protected by civil law. In this sense, the opportunity to refuse to take part in the phases of consultation, preparation and execution of these acts against life should be guaranteed to physicians, health-care personnel, and directors of hospitals, clinics and convalescent facilities [Like the Little Sisters of the Poor]. Those who have recourse to conscientious objection must be protected not only from legal penalties but also from any negative effects on the legal, disciplinary, financial and professional plane.


5 posted on 01/05/2014 2:11:46 AM PST by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet; Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; ...

Ping!


11 posted on 01/05/2014 4:48:15 AM PST by NYer ("The wise man is the one who can save his soul. - St. Nimatullah Al-Hardini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

How the average American can look themselves in the mirror each day with this vicious tyrant kicking sand in their face is beyond me. He and his entire administration needs to be impeached and imprisoned.


12 posted on 01/05/2014 4:54:01 AM PST by ZULU (Impeach that Bastard Barrack Hussein Obama the Doctor Mengele of Medical Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Obamacare forces ninety year old nuns to buy contraceptives. Obama calls it his “Immaculate Deception”.


13 posted on 01/05/2014 4:58:53 AM PST by csmusaret (Will remove Obama-Biden bumperstickers for $10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

“Religious” can only extend to the True Religion. Note; Mohammedans are exempt. Obamacare institutionalizes Dhimmi status for infidels in the USofA.


14 posted on 01/05/2014 5:35:39 AM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Obama could just do what Kim Jong did to his uncle:

Feed all the nuns into a cage of 120 starving dogs. Problem solved.


15 posted on 01/05/2014 6:21:24 AM PST by bestintxas (Obamacare = Obamascrewed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

http://www.westernfreepress.com/2014/01/04/judge-jeanines-2014-wishlist-destroys-obama-and-his-gang/

Awesome!


16 posted on 01/05/2014 6:27:52 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Leftist Media Cult Members Attack Little Sisters Of The Poor, Calling Them “Weasels” For Refusing To Be Bullied By Obama Regime

http://weaselzippers.us/


18 posted on 01/05/2014 6:42:58 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet; RichInOC; Prince of Space; JoeFromSidney; TNMountainMan; alphadog; infool7; Heart-Rest; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

19 posted on 01/05/2014 6:53:52 AM PST by narses (... unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson