Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New DOJ, HHS Rules Aimed at Mental State of Gun Owners
PJ Media ^ | 1-3-2014 | Bridget Johnson

Posted on 01/04/2014 4:11:12 AM PST by Sir Napsalot

WASHINGTON — As Capitol Hill was getting ready to march back to work after the holiday break, the Justice Department tweeted a photo of Attorney General Eric Holder’s hands signing new regulations to clarify who should be flagged in the federal background check system for mental health conditions.

That was coupled with a second action over at the Department of Health and Human Services, which aims to remove barriers that prevent some states from reporting mental health conditions to the background check system.

The Justice Department said Holder’s “clarification will help states determine what information may be appropriately shared with the federal background check system for firearms transfers – the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) – in order to keep guns out of the hands of individuals who may be a danger to themselves or others.”

The proposed regulation, which became available for review at the Federal Register on Friday afternoon, would revise the definition of “adjudicated as a mental defective” and “committed to a mental institution” to include “persons who are found incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect; persons lacking mental responsibility or deemed insane; and persons found guilty but mentally ill, regardless of whether these determinations are made by a state, local, federal or military court” as well as “a person committed to involuntary inpatient or outpatient treatment.”

“We are taking an important, commonsense step to clarify the federal firearms regulations, which will strengthen our ability to keep dangerous weapons out of the wrong hands,” Holder said. ........ (Read more at source)

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Riiiiight. As if I can trust the execution by the gubmint, or simply put, if I can trust the gubmint.

And IRS targeting tea party or patriots is (Obama:) 'manufactured by the media'?

And Obamacare is allllll about providing affordable healthcare to millions of uninsured.

1 posted on 01/04/2014 4:11:12 AM PST by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I’ve been saying for a long time now that this isn’t near finished.

You will see in the future that other medical information will be added. ADD, ADHD, any mood altering prescriptions (say, for tobacco withdrawal, etc.) and a host of other drugs will eventually put that person on a no-gun list at NICS.

It will eventually include those going through divorces, lawsuits, etc. It will end, just before complete registration and confiscation, with having to get a complete psychiatric and medical examination and approval by the appropriate government approved doctors involved.


2 posted on 01/04/2014 4:16:34 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Holder has been a very important part of making sure weapons —very many of them — get into the WRONG hands.

This new chapter puts front and center the role of healthcare as an instrument of political terror against American Dissidents.

Many freeprs know Holder once had a Mod Squad Fro and he took over occupied a federal building with no charges. In his first days as AG he had no problem withbooted Black Panthers with billy clubs in front of polling places on Election Day.

Will they leave office in three years...?

CONTROL. CONTROL. CONTROL.


3 posted on 01/04/2014 4:22:14 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Questionaire.........did you vote for obama both times? determines your mental state in thier eyes.


4 posted on 01/04/2014 4:22:29 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

In light of NSA domestic spying on everyone, this is rightfully suspect.


5 posted on 01/04/2014 4:25:37 AM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Is being fed up with lies and BS from elected officials and tyranny from non elected bureaucrats a mental disorder?


6 posted on 01/04/2014 4:31:33 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

When I read this, I immediately wondered if taking “depression meds” for one year, several years ago, would disqualify me from buying a firearm! I better go do so right away!


7 posted on 01/04/2014 4:36:18 AM PST by REPANDPROUDOFIT (November can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
(White House) “The Administration is committed to making sure that anyone who may pose a danger to themselves or others does not have access to a gun.......” (excerpt)

As stated, Adam Lanza’s mother wouldn't be able to legally purchase firearms to protect herself (for example: from a mentally ill son).

Think of the ramifications of the “clarification”

8 posted on 01/04/2014 4:36:19 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
<<<<<<<<<“We are taking an important, commonsense step to clarify the federal firearms regulations, which will strengthen our ability to keep dangerous weapons out of the wrong hands,” Holder said.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Anytime you see the words, IMPORTANT, COMMONSENSE and/or CLARIFY in the same sentence, you know we are going to get shafted. Then add in the words STRENGTHEN OUR, AND I can guarantee we, the people are going to be fooked.
BOHICA.

9 posted on 01/04/2014 4:38:09 AM PST by Tupelo (I am feeling more like Philip Nolan every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo; gaijin
(Always) remember, Fast and Furious was taken a Bush era policy and cooked up by Holder, Hillary, (Tiny Tim)Geithner, (and who knows what/who else).

So they can impose Gun Control on regular Americans who believe in their 2nd Amendment Rights.

10 posted on 01/04/2014 4:45:14 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

“And it is emblematic of the Justice Department’s broader commitment to use every tool and resource at its disposal to combat gun violence and prevent future tragedies while respecting the Constitutional rights to which all Americans are entitled,” Holder added.

11 posted on 01/04/2014 4:47:54 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

So, they’re no longer hampered by the old outdated requirement for Congress to pass legislation before they do something like this?


12 posted on 01/04/2014 4:49:02 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Nope.

THIS stems from Obama EO, without any chirps from Congress.

13 posted on 01/04/2014 5:06:08 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Sorry, I should clarify. I don’t know if Obama really issued an EO, but his directive has ‘the same power’.

Just like Obama never told IRS to target tea party or Patriots.


14 posted on 01/04/2014 5:10:34 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

The government at war against it’s people.


15 posted on 01/04/2014 5:16:16 AM PST by Anton.Rutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Yup. That’s the point. We no longer have a Republic.


16 posted on 01/04/2014 5:22:12 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
On the other hand, we have this -

Obama Bypasses Congress with Executive Actions on Gun Background Checks

17 posted on 01/04/2014 5:23:56 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Anyone who has ever mentioned to a doctor that they have been depressed or stressed will now be prohibited from owning a firearm.

This is one of the principle goals of Obamacare.

Power. Control. Universal disarmament.


18 posted on 01/04/2014 5:26:55 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
From the Party that parses the meaning of the word "is", the following statement bothers the hell out of me:

“a person committed to involuntary inpatient or outpatient treatment.”

Why not "a person involuntarily committed to either inpatient or outpatient treatment?

Plus, I'm sure a number of states like Florida, where it is called the Baker Act, have a state-forced, involuntary commitment used for psychiatric evaluation. The time-limit for commitment is short (72 hours in FL) and used to determine if a person is a danger to himself.

My question is does this law STILL apply if a person is "Baker Acted" then found to be not a danger and released? I bet it does and I bet it will be used to take firearms from someone who has been Baker Acted and found not to be a danger. My concern is that any cop or healthcare worker can refer someone to be "Baker Acted"

Discharge or Release from being "Baker Acted"
 
A person may not be held for involuntary examination longer than 72 hours. 
Within the 72-hour examination period, one of the following must take place: 
• The person must be released unless charged with a crime; 
• The person must be released for outpatient treatment; 
• The person must be asked to give express and informed consent to 
voluntary placement; or 
• A petition for involuntary placement must be filed with the circuit court by 
the facility administrator

Baker Act Involuntary Commitment

19 posted on 01/04/2014 5:47:04 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Under these regulations and definitions, no Democrat should ever be armed. Liberalism is a mental disorder.


20 posted on 01/04/2014 5:56:04 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson