Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart
In the end, I am convinced that the scenario will play out as it has so many times before. I just pray to God that there are more of the people in your post than mine so that we can minimize the hell that’s unleashed, faster.

There are more of us, than there are of them, Normie. Every poll that has ever been run on the question bears that out. Logic also dictates that if there were more of them than there are of us, the nation would have imploded economically long ago. It hasn't, which indicates that most people are still on the wagon pulling side of the equation.

But let's go back to the questions posed by Walter Williams in the article above. How are the good and decent people of this country going to respond to the confluence of events that are irrevocably overtaking this country? As he brilliantly deduced, there are only four logical responses to the absolute tyranny that's on its way.

Without restating them, I can see only two that are likely (though the possibility exists for them all). The first is political dis-unification, or, secession by several red states. The second is a full scale rebellion by the people.

Of the two, secession is the more likely, because it promises a peaceful political solution to the tension of our divisions. It would be up to the blue states to simply accept it, or respond to it with force. Like King George III before them, I think the blue states would be shocked and amazed by the resolve of the red states to be free of their grip, and would soon discover that the resolve of the red states also translates into deadly reaction on their part.

Personally, I don't believe that they'll find the political or even cultural will to go that far to stop us. There'd no doubt be a great deal of social turmoil and dislocation caused by secession, but I believe that a mobilized citizenry and their appointed state militias would keep a handle on the worst of it.

What I don't think we'd see, is a military response from Washington. Frankly, the political pressure for a non-violent response is much more evident in today's cultural climate. Nations around the world would condemn the U.S. in the worst ways imaginable, if they chose to launch a military campaign against a peaceful political separation of states.

106 posted on 01/03/2014 1:19:42 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

Sure there are mor of us gross. but what about the net? How many of that number would do squat other than cower in their corner afraid to offend someone and lose their flatscreen?

Seriously. People that cant stand up for something like their own principles on an internet forum because they are aftaid they might look extreme aren’t gonna go get the 12 gauge any time soon. We can look to Germany, my half ancestors for what happens in a real world scenario when liberals march. They find some excuse to join the party.

If I have to put a number on it, I would look at our own little microcosom right here. Right off the bat, everyone was going to neverevernever vote for that radical liberal babykiller Mitt Romney. As the primary approached, some people would vote for that liberal mitt Romney. After the primary, half of FR was onboard with the Lesser Evil Mit Romney. As the election approached, 3/4 of the people were either remaining silent or attacking everyone in sight that refused to get on board the the only thing that could save us from liberal baby killer Barry Soetero.

My how things come full circle.

As I asked earlier as a generalization...Are you personally willing to bet your life and the lives of your family that people that cannot even cast a nameless and faceless vote for what they claim to believe in, will have your back when the SHTF?

Considering the only people Barry attacks are people against his interests and considering that the UN goes to bat for or at least only writes stern letters against him, I don’t think they have an issue helping to eliminate a bunch of hated cristians and others who won’t play ball. I mean they do it all the time in other parts of the world.

Sure we got guns. They have plenty of cannon foder to give us targets. And they will with promises of new homelands and other such crap. Just like they did in Africa in more than one country there.

I think we have to split the country for the reasons stated in the article and more. To me it is rediculously obvious that one way or another, its coming. But it will be a fight and we have more problems with Vichy idiots than we will with the left. If we survive them, and their insistance on compromise, lesser evil and often flat out cowardice, the rest will go quick.


107 posted on 01/03/2014 1:42:00 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson