And certainly the family can arrange private transport to the house and private ventilator service and pay for it, but it will be at their own expense as insurance terminates at death, and the girl is dead. If they have a macabre obsession to ventilate a corpse, then I suppose that is their decision, but no one else should have to pay for it. Maybe ifinnegan would like to pay for it? Or defray the million dollar a month cost that this will certainly incur?
I see you use the term corpse again.
This s the crux of the discussion and the reason for your retreat in that there s no way for you defend the use of the term and seem too prideful admit it is not accurate.
You insist on using this term inaccurately to present a distorted representation of brain death and the situation of this grl’s body.
This took place in December 12.
A corpse would have no benefit from a ventilator.
Would have no circulating blood.
Would not be able to be maintained at normal body temperature.
Would not be able to maintain physiological and metabolic function of organs or other systems.
A corpse that died on Dec 12 would not be able to donate organs or tissues.
You are quite remiss in your responsibilities in using such disinformative language.
“And certainly the family can arrange private transport to the house and private ventilator service and pay for it”
Yes.
We are in full agreement and you have finally addressed the actual issue which I first addressed to you stating your comment describing brain death diagnosis was beside the point.
It took time, but you finally got there. Congrats, Doctor.
He or she is a flipping idiot.