“And certainly the family can arrange private transport to the house and private ventilator service and pay for it”
Yes.
We are in full agreement and you have finally addressed the actual issue which I first addressed to you stating your comment describing brain death diagnosis was beside the point.
It took time, but you finally got there. Congrats, Doctor.
You have claimed victory in ignorance to the issue. You have not addressed the macabre nor legal ramifications of continue to ventilate a dead person. In America you have the freedom to make irrational decisions. It does not change that the child is dead, nor does it change any of the science. I do not agree with you in any way shape or form. You fail to address the queries around accepting the child is dead. I would support your freedom to go dig up a family member in the cemetery dead for two weeks and place them on a ventilator at your own expense, but that does not mean that that person IS ANY LESS DEAD. Please understand the difference between the freedom to make a foolish choice rooted on science (again something which you never address) and agreement. I need neither the congrats nor the accolades of the wrong or foolish. Claiming victory in your case only increases the delusional quality of your logic.