Skip to comments.
Big-bang-defying giant of astronomy passes away (article)
Creation.com ^
| 12-31-13
| John G. Hartnett
Posted on 01/02/2014 9:11:49 AM PST by fishtank
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Halton Arp (19272013)
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
1
posted on
01/02/2014 9:11:49 AM PST
by
fishtank
To: fishtank
2
posted on
01/02/2014 9:16:34 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(It's not the penalty, it's the lack of coverage on 1 Jan. Think about it.)
To: fishtank
Chip Arp will be missed. He was well liked by everyone ion the astronomical community.
Rest in Peace
To: SunkenCiv
4
posted on
01/02/2014 9:32:13 AM PST
by
Squawk 8888
(I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
To: buffaloguy
Einstein was right! For the big bang to have happened, all laws of physics and nature would have to be suspended for some time and then have to be reinstated. It happened some other way, but not the big bang.
To: maxwellsmart_agent
So far, the Big Bang seems to be holding up. There are problems with Arps’s theories which haven’t been resolved to anyone’s satisfaction.
To: fishtank
7
posted on
01/02/2014 10:09:59 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: fishtank
Arp's book is worth reading. It is accessible to the non-scientist. Even if he's wrong, he presents some strong arguments that must be answered by the proponents of a big bang.
To: buffaloguy
Big Bang is a bunch of flagrant bullshit which should have been rejected on day one on purely philosophical grounds. Having all the mass of the universe collapsed to a point would be the mother of all black holes; nothing would ever “bang(TM)” its way out of that.
To: Moonman62
The old works in a drawer tv set? Yeah I remember those.
10
posted on
01/02/2014 12:05:20 PM PST
by
xp38
To: xp38
Wow that’s a memory from my youth.
11
posted on
01/02/2014 12:06:56 PM PST
by
nascarnation
(I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
To: varmintman
The Big Bang theory was around in the 1950’s until Einstein got ahold of it. He completely obliterated it. They went silent until after he died in 1956. Then the goofballs started climbing out from under the woodwork again. There is no science behind the theory.
To: fishtank
Was not aware that Halton Arp had passed.
RIP Mr. Arp.
I enjoy scientific anomalies and he found them, with proof.
13
posted on
01/02/2014 2:10:18 PM PST
by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
To: maxwellsmart_agent
Check out "
Hidden in Plain Sight 2" by Dr. Andrew Thomas. 0.99 dollars on Kindle. Fairly radical, and highly thought provoking. Generally, that gravity aims to hold systems of objects (and massive objects) at their Schwartzchild radius. The "big bang" was no bang, no "inflationary" period. The expansion of the universe is speeding up as we see it, now, due to nature's impulse, enforced by gravity, that the size of the universe be its Schwarzchild radius.
14
posted on
01/02/2014 2:25:52 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: xp38
15
posted on
01/02/2014 2:26:23 PM PST
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
16
posted on
01/02/2014 4:37:39 PM PST
by
xp38
To: Squawk 8888; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
Ouch! Thanks Squawk 8888. R.I.P. to a giant. Three-list ping, four with an extra to APoD.
17
posted on
01/02/2014 8:57:17 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
To: maxwellsmart_agent
When you got nothing else, just call it a big bang.... everything out of nothing.
There’s no possible way of explaining what everything was even one second before the ‘big bang’.
18
posted on
01/02/2014 9:45:04 PM PST
by
Bullish
(America should yank Obama like a rotten tooth before he poisons the entire body)
To: fishtank
Nice picture, oh, and the TV is nice too.
To: fishtank; NonValueAdded; buffaloguy; Squawk 8888; maxwellsmart_agent; Moonman62; JoeFromSidney; ...
I never believed the Big Bang theory, it just didn't feel right to me.
A black hole is a region of spacetime from which gravity prevents anything, including light, from escaping. The existence of black holes allows the compression of all matter into one huge singularity, which allows the Big Bang theory to be a possible truth.
However, the black hole model has been called into doubt by none other than Stephen Hawking, who now says that matter can escape from ‘black’ holes. If Black Holes aren't truly excape-proof, how is the formation of the exploding massive singularity possible?
20
posted on
01/28/2014 5:09:24 PM PST
by
exodus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson