She’s qualified under her husband’s plan but doesn’t want to pay for it.
Sorry but you can have coverage but not for free!!!!
That’s it exactly. She wanted cheap healthcare, and she can’t find any.
How does a freelance yoga instructor accurately report income?
I think the libs are still stuck on the implied or inferred lie that Obamacare meant
free healthcare for all on demand.
“She’s qualified under her husband’s plan but doesn’t want to pay for it.”
My guess is coverage under the husband’s plan is probably about the same as unsubsidized coverage under Obamacare. I would think they’d be able to cover the child, somehow. I’m wondering if/why hubby’s ins. doesn’t offer a parent/child option, that can be economical.
“Sorry but you can have coverage but not for free!!!!”
She could divorce her husband and he would have to foot the bill