Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise me or Republicanprofessor.
The NYT with their "Bush lied" mantra directly contradicted what they had been reporting all thru the Clinton years. The Times reported time and time again in the 90's that Clinton's people believed Saddam had WMD. It was Clinton who made regime change official US policy based on WMD.
But when Bush couldn't find WMD, it was suddenly only Bush who had "lied" with no more mention of what the Clinton people had said over and over again.
Now the Slimes is again up to their old tricks.
And I remind one and all that al qaeda’s abu yahya al-libi was so named because he was from....libya.
You know, I think everybody is on to them at this point. Even a Democrat Congressman went on TV (along with his republican colleague) today to say: er, no, that report’s not accurate.
How insulted was his intelligence for him to do that?
They are still influencing the broadcast media (CBS, NBC, ABC, etc.) which in turn influences the low info voters, but other than that I think they are just preaching to the Upper West Side choir.
You bury her by playing her desire for Hillary care which became Obama.
If you like your taxes politician like Hillary, you can keep her.
Play that stuff and people will get it IMO.
This is still the paper of Walter Duranty who denied that the deliberate starvation of Ukraine ever happened
The NYT, Pravda, Tass, and Izvestia were praising the Russo-German Non-Aggression Pact as a major accomplishment of Stalin's USSR when the Germans attacked the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941. Even Stalin wouldn't believe his fellow dictator, Hitler, had betrayed him and had pulled a double-cross. Soviet trains containing supplies and goods continued to Germany for several days as German tanks, planes, and infantry swarmed into Soviet territory as part of Operation BARBAROSSA.
IOW, the Slimes’ piece was Hitlary’s hat being thrown into the ring.