As I said, the “government narrative” is usually backed by LIARS, as we’ve amply seen in the past. The people who won’t lie for the government are not asked to make these kinds of statements.
And since it’s clear that they are LYING from those who have been there in the government and are now able to speak out, and they have chosen to speak out to right a wrong, we don’t have to take the word of LIARS IN GOVERNMENT, since we have the testimony of the others who have told us differently.
It’s also amply clear, without any “inside information” that Pollard’s time-served is GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE compared to others who have been convicted and jailed, in similar circumstances.
The judgement on my part (and others who speak out) is that some of these people are nothing more than GOVERNMENT-PAID LIARS.
Are we to take it from this then that your response to my question about your specific objections to the statement by Pollard’s former boss at Naval Intelligence, and three others who had held the same position of director of Naval Intelligence, site of Pollard’s crimes, is that they and his former boss are lying about Pollard? I want to be clear that’s what you’re saying, to paraphrase your response: ‘Pollard’s former boss at Naval Intelligence is lying about Pollard’?