Are we to take it from this then that your response to my question about your specific objections to the statement by Pollard’s former boss at Naval Intelligence, and three others who had held the same position of director of Naval Intelligence, site of Pollard’s crimes, is that they and his former boss are lying about Pollard? I want to be clear that’s what you’re saying, to paraphrase your response: ‘Pollard’s former boss at Naval Intelligence is lying about Pollard’?
When I hear officials that have access to the information contradict others who make reports, and I see that there are facts “on the outside” apart from the inside information that totally contradicts the LYING OFFICIALS ... I have to make a decision as to which group “who knows” IS LYING.
It’s obvious that those carrying forward the government narrative ARE LYING, but there may be an “out” for them on that judgement.
NOW ... inside government, it’s not unknown that information control and LIES can be exercised right inside agencies and directed right at people who are going to be USED as spokesmen, or making a report.
I wouldn’t put it past some officials to DUPE THOSE who may be tasked with a report, by controlling the information.
THEREFORE, to give some individuals the benefit of the doubt, I’ll say it’s possible some could be simply DUPED by the control of information to them - or - they could be outright PAID LIARS.
I can’t tell you whether some were DUPED and who — but it’s clear they are ADVANCING A LYING GOVERNMENT NARRATIVE!!